still no accelerated X ($#!$*)
Kevin Hendricks
khendricks at ivey.uwo.ca
Fri Jan 21 05:25:40 EST 2000
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
> Why does each application/library define its own, incorrect
> definition of byte-reversed instructions? Doesn't some Linux/PPC header
> file define this once in a awy that could be imported by others?
I could not find one. I will look again.
> One cannot use "r" as a constraint for a base address, that is
> what the GCC PowerPC port defines "b" for. The load/store instruction
> patterns in the GCC PowerPC machine description file use a different
> constraint letter for the base address, and anyone writing inlined
> assembly -- especially loads and stores -- should browse the GCC machine
> description.
Thanks I will as soon as I find it ;-). But the assembler generated was exactly
the same in my simple test case. Is this just luck?
Thanks,
Kevin
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list