Fwd: Re: still no accelerated X ($#!$*)

[Kevin Hendricks]

Hi,

Can anyone explain this to me?

> Finally I got it!

>   asm("stwbrx %0,%1,%2": : "r"(regdata), "r"(regindex), "r"(base_addr));

>   asm("lwbrx %0,%1,%2": "=r"(val):"r"(regindex), "r"(base_addr));

>   asm("stwbrx %0,%1,%2": : "r"(regdata), "b"(regindex), "r"(base_addr));

>   asm("lwbrx %0,%1,%2": "=r"(val):"b"(regindex), "r"(base_addr));


> Don't know if this is correct (no clue about ppc assembly), but it works...

Well I did the following with the attached sample program:

gcc -O0 -S testit.c

then I looked at testit.s  (the assembler).

old_regw:
        stwu 1,-32(1)
        stw 31,28(1)
        mr 31,1
        stw 3,8(31)
        mr 0,4
        lis 11,mach64MemReg at ha
        lwz 9,mach64MemReg at l(11)
        lwz 11,8(31)
        stwbrx 0,11,9
.L2:
        lwz 11,0(1)
        lwz 31,-4(11)
        mr 1,11
        blr
.Lfe2:
        .size    old_regw,.Lfe2-old_regw
        .align 2
        .type    old_regr, at function
old_regr:
        stwu 1,-32(1)
        stw 31,28(1)
        mr 31,1
        stw 3,8(31)
        lis 9,mach64MemReg at ha
        lwz 0,mach64MemReg at l(9)
        lwz 11,8(31)
        lwbrx 9,11,0
        mr 3,9
        b .L3
.L3:
        lwz 11,0(1)
        lwz 31,-4(11)
        mr 1,11
        blr
.Lfe3:
        .size    old_regr,.Lfe3-old_regr
        .align 2
:regw:
        stwu 1,-32(1)
        stw 31,28(1)
        mr 31,1
        stw 3,8(31)
        mr 0,4
        lis 11,mach64MemReg at ha
        lwz 9,mach64MemReg at l(11)
        lwz 11,8(31)
        stwbrx 0,11,9
.L4:
        lwz 11,0(1)
        lwz 31,-4(11)
        mr 1,11
        blr
.Lfe4:
        .size    regw,.Lfe4-regw
        .align 2
        .type    regr, at function
regr:
        stwu 1,-32(1)
        stw 31,28(1)
        mr 31,1
        stw 3,8(31)
        lis 9,mach64MemReg at ha
        lwz 0,mach64MemReg at l(9)
        lwz 11,8(31)
        lwbrx 9,11,0
        mr 3,9
        b .L5
.L5:
        lwz 11,0(1)
        lwz 31,-4(11)
        mr 1,11
        blr

And I simply can not see any difference in the actual code produced by each
bunch of asm statements which leads me to believe that there is something else
going on here.

I would love to know exactly what.

Will you please try compiling the code I attached to get the assembler out and
compare old_regr and regr and old_rew and regw and see if you find any
differences.


Are you sure you haven't changed *anything* else?

Thanks,

Kevin

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: testit.c
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20000120/a65010eb/attachment.asc>