Status of PCI-PCI bridge on UMAX S900
jingai
jingai at floatingpenguins.com
Fri Dec 29 11:16:41 EST 2000
> just a short followup to the message i sent to debian-powerpc, i applied
> the following diff and was able to move my usb board to the other side of
the
>
> umax/s900 bridge w/o any ill effect:
>
> --- prom.c.000 Thu Dec 28 08:43:12 2000
> +++ prom.c Thu Dec 28 09:06:16 2000
> @@ -1563,8 +1563,8 @@
> }
>
> ip = (int *) get_property(np, "AAPL,interrupts", &l);
> - if (ip == 0)
> - ip = (int *) get_property(np, "interrupts", &l);
> + if (ip == 0 && np->parent != NULL)
> + ip = (int *) get_property(np->parent, "AAPL,interrupts",
> &l);
> if (ip != 0) {
> np->intrs = (struct interrupt_info *) mem_start;
> np->n_intrs = l / sizeof(int);
Doh! I didn't even think to check if the second get_property() call
was returning > 0.. this fixes it! Thanks bunches for spotting that!
> on a related, note, shouldnt the 'right' code be:
>
> ip = (int *) get_property(np, "interrupts", &l);
> if (ip > 0)
> {
> /* find and assign interrupt -- see above */
> }
>
> pci boards should only get an interrupt if they have the interrupt
> property (which seems to be the number of interrupts, not the interrupt
number)
Seems correct to me, but I'm no kernel guru, so I'll let someone else
answer
authoritatively.
-j
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list