rtc again...
Gabriel Paubert
paubert at iram.es
Wed Aug 9 23:50:09 EST 2000
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> >I'm slightly lost :-(. But whether the clock is in UTC or not is a
> >parameter (defined in /etc/sysconfig/clock or another system configuration
> >file), so I think that translating to/from UTC when setting the clock is a
> >purely userland job and set/get_rtc_time should never have to handle this.
>
> The problem is that those functions are in-kernel, and without proper
> conversion, they could put incorrect time in the RTC. Those are called by
> /dev/rtc on macintosh, additionally, get_rtc_time() is called at boot,
> and set_rtc_time() used to be called regulary (the famous code I #if'ed out).
No, the code was wrong, it should only be called if the kernel PLL is
running, i.e. if STA_UNSYNC is 0. Since STA_UNSYNC is set at boot, it
should never be called by default. And this code should also only track
small drifts, i.e., only set the minutes and seconds for NTP.
> So if it's a userland-only thing, then the set_time() must be removed
> since the kernel can't know if the RTC is UTC or local time. Except if we
> decide that on PowerMac, we always follow Apple layout (to be compatible
> with MacOS X) and implement the UTC/local conversion inside those so they
> always expose UTC times to the kernel.
>
> >No, AFAICT nothing bothers with it, only the clock program at boot.
>
> And the fat file system (see below)
Some other file systems bother with the the zone too, and that one is only
set on every reboot on your average Linux machine...
>
> >First it is 99% a userland problem: just set export TZ=UTC or any path in
> >/usr/share/zoneinfo and all dates will appear as if you were in this
> >timezone (try date or ls -l).
> >
> >The translation between UTC and localtime is performed in the C library,
> >using the TZ environment variable or /etc/localtime, and it will know when
> >to switch between DST and non DST.
> >
> >The last problem is updating the clock through NTP when the RTC is running
> >in local time. Since these are generally small corrections, there are
> >solutions (but the comments of the i386 version say that it is buggy :-().
>
> I see no solution to this problem but do the conversion in kernel. Also,
> whatever userland does after boot, it's nice to have a correct time and
> timezone as early as possible, especialy if it takes only a few lines of
> kernel code to grab the correct MacOS values.
I agree on the point if setting the timezone at boot, that's basically the
only thing I would consider permissible. For the rest the RTC is running
as is, and /dev/rtc gives you direct acces to the HW: no cooked values,
you always end up losing when playing such games.
> I don't see why we shouldn't have those in-kernel get/set time do the
> conversion, at least on pmac. I see no point of trying to mimmic the PC
> behaviour here.
I do see some: principle of least surprise for people porting applications
between PC and Mac. Minimize #ifdef noise in their sources...
> The Mac clock is supposed to run local time, but we do
> have the timezone info in a known location in pram, I see no reason to
> let users (on pmac at least) store UTC in the RTC. CHRP/PReP are a
> different matter.
I happen to disagree, it depends on what will happen with MacOS and the
schizophreny of having timezone parameters in the NVRAM and in the OS
config. I don't know MacOS so I might be wrong, but there might be a
solution running if MacOS does things in a sensible way (preferences
override RAM settings, which is the right thing to do when you are
travelling around the world with your notebook, and also if you have to
zap the RAM for some reason):
During Linux boot: read the time and offset from xpram and set xtime
accordingly (preventing further timewarps by using do_sys_settimofday),
then clear the timezone info in the RAM, and rewrite the clock so that it
runs in UTC.
Under MacOS: use MacOS preferences to set the timezone at least once,
hopefully when it boots it will either a) leave the RTC as is (making it
work properly as an UTC clock), or b) warp the clock and save the offsets
in RAM.
Yes, this is strange, but the original error lies with Apple storing the
time as local time while keeping also the timezone. I can understand and
even agree on keeping the timezone and the DST flag in RAM, but then why
the heck do you want to store the RTC in local time ? It only makes thing
more complex around DST changes or when changing timezones when you
travel. I thought Macs were about simplicity...
> Now, I need to check how this interracts with our pmac /dev/rtc so that
> userland "see" a consistent kernel interface. This new /dev/rtc driver
> means userland will go thry the ppc_md.set/get time functions when using
> this driver (the old "clock" program used to directly talk to Cuda/PMU
> via /dev/adb, I wanted to get rid of that).
>
> >Until now I've found a single place where sys_tz.dsttime is used in the
> >kernel: fs/fat/misc.c when converting between Unix and FAT timestamps.
> >Interestingly it's used only in one direction, so it definitely looks like
> >a bug. Some other filesystems (affs/hfs/ncpfs/ufs) use the timezone
> >information but not the dst field, making FAT time handling look even
> >buggier.
>
> Yep. My understanding (and that's also how MacOS uses it) is that the DST
> correction is _included_ in the timezone offset, the dst field beeing
> just an indication. So yes, FAT is probably broken.
Who uses FAT anyway ? I'm going to patch my kernels to kill sys_tz, now
that I've come to the conclusion that its mere existence is an
aberration... With an UTC clock, it's the only sensible solution ;-). But
I don't suggest that everybody should do the same...
Regards,
Gabriel
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list