CONFIG_PPC != Mac
Dan Malek
dan at netx4.com
Tue Aug 1 09:22:56 EST 2000
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Given the flexibility I was used to on m68k[*], I find this a pity as well...
Well, it looks like I opened up a big can of worms...........
I guess this is something that will get discussed as part of
"restructuring" the PowerPC source tree when we jump into 2.5.xx.
However, I need some kind of a simple solution that will help me with
the embedded processors that will no longer build in the 2.4.xx
kernel. I know there must be some embedded Linux m68k boards that
have a similar challenge that I may be able to use for insight.
What I would like to do in the short term, is create a CONFIG_PPCMAC
that has the sole purpose of including the drivers/macintosh software,
or perhaps overload the CONFIG_ALL_PPC to do this. Perhaps I will
look at what CONFIG_PPC really means, and not define this for embedded
boards (although this sounds wrong).
Thanks for the comments. We'll be back :-).
-- Dan
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list