dl-load.c (ld.so) bug??

Hollis R Blanchard hollis+ at andrew.cmu.edu
Thu Jun 24 00:19:32 EST 1999

On Wed, 23 Jun 1999, Kevin Puetz wrote:

> Umm... just thought of this - a segfault in __libc_start_main is the symptom
> of an old R4 binary on a glibc2.1 system... did ElectricFence not get
> updated (just a thought)? Then - if both libraries load - it segfaults when
> electricfence initializes _it's_ glibc dynamic link. One could try
> rebuilding the SRPM and see...
> Possible? Or am I on crack (don't know much about efence or glibc internals,
> so... probably the latter.)

Doesn't look like it's an R4 problem... I just rebuilt it and it does the same
thing. A different __libc_start_main thing, I guess.


[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list.  Replies are ]]
[[ not  forced  back  to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting.   ]]

More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list