ld bug with -Bsymbolic --noinhibit-exec (184.108.40.206.990418-1c)
Franz.Sirl-kernel at lauterbach.com
Thu Jun 17 06:40:31 EST 1999
Am Mit, 16 Jun 1999 schrieb Eric Ding:
>>>>>> Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel at lauterbach.com> writes:
>> Ok, would you mind trying binutils-220.127.116.11.5 on Intel too? It's
>> available on <ftp://ftp.varesearch.com/pub/support/hjl/binutils/beta>
>> as a RPM.
>> I'm trying to sort out if this is related to newer binutils or if it's
>> PPC specific.
>just noticed I called you Frank last time. Sorry 'bout that. :)
no problem :-). I didn't even notice...
>I had a co-worker test out the Intel 18.104.22.168.5 binutils and it worked
>without a problem on that hardware platform.
Hmm, I browsed thru the binutils code and didn't see anything suspicious. Is
there any chance you can strip that down to a small testcase with a few
symbols? That would help debugging a lot.
>> BTW, I'm "franzo" on #mklinux/EFNet for even faster feedback :-)
>I don't have irc access from work (this is irc, right?)...
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
More information about the Linuxppc-dev