Netatalk bug?, too many routes/iface
a sun
asun at saul4.u.washington.edu
Wed Jul 28 05:32:39 EST 1999
I presume, then, that this is a bug in the Appletalk code in LinuxPPC,
even though it's numbered 0.18, as compared to 0.17 in the Redhat 5.2
we're running on our Intel machines. The Intel machines have no problem
with our network numbering ranges, which, according to our network
administrator, can legally go from 1 to 65535.
i think that it might have been an endianness bug, but i'm not
sure. if it still happens with linux-2.2.10, let me know, and i'll
look into it. oh yeah, your administrator is wrong about the range of
possible network numbers. numbers from 65280 to 65534 are reserved for
routerless networks.
-a
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list