[PATCH v4 08/17] dt-bindings: fsi: ast2600-fsi-master: Convert to json-schema
Eddie James
eajames at linux.ibm.com
Thu May 2 02:12:40 AEST 2024
On 4/30/24 02:04, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 29/04/2024 23:01, Eddie James wrote:
>> Convert to json-schema for the AST2600 FSI master documentation.
> Please mention all the changes from pure conversion.
Sure.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Eddie James <eajames at linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v3:
>> - Remove quotes around compatible strings
>> - Re-order allOf to below required
>> - Add child node in the example
>> - Change commit message to match similar commits
>>
>> .../fsi/aspeed,ast2600-fsi-master.yaml | 81 +++++++++++++++++++
>> .../bindings/fsi/fsi-master-aspeed.txt | 36 ---------
>> 2 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/aspeed,ast2600-fsi-master.yaml
>> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/fsi-master-aspeed.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/aspeed,ast2600-fsi-master.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/aspeed,ast2600-fsi-master.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..fcf7c4b93b78
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/aspeed,ast2600-fsi-master.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/fsi/aspeed,ast2600-fsi-master.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: Aspeed FSI master
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> + - Eddie James <eajames at linux.ibm.com>
>> +
>> +description:
>> + The AST2600 and later contain two identical FSI masters. They share a
>> + clock and have a separate interrupt line and output pins.
>> +
>> +properties:
>> + compatible:
>> + enum:
>> + - aspeed,ast2600-fsi-master
>> + - aspeed,ast2700-fsi-master
> There was no such compatible before.
>
> How does this even validate? Where is fsi-master? You dropped a
> compatible without any explanation.
I can make it a separate change to add ast2700.
I suppose I don't understand having two compatibles... Aspeed master
shouldn't use "fsi-master" as that is too generic, right? Why wouldn't
it validate? Devicetrees using "fsi-master" also use
"aspeed,ast2600-fsi-master" so they should be OK...
>
>> +
>> + reg:
>> + maxItems: 1
>> +
>> + clocks:
>> + maxItems: 1
>> +
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
More information about the linux-fsi
mailing list