[PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: fsi: Document the IBM SBEFIFO engine

[Andrew Jeffery]

On Fri, 2024-04-12 at 09:43 -0500, Eddie James wrote:
> The SBEFIFO engine provides an interface to the POWER processor
> Self Boto Engine (SBE).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eddie James <eajames at linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/fsi/ibm,sbefifo.yaml  | 39 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/ibm,sbefifo.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/ibm,sbefifo.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/ibm,sbefifo.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d70012e42d79
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/ibm,sbefifo.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/fsi/ibm,sbefifo.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: IBM FSI-attached SBEFIFO engine
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Eddie James <eajames at linux.ibm.com>
> +
> +description: |
> +  This binding describes an FSI CFAM engine called the SBEFIFO. Therefore this
> +  node will always be a child of an FSI CFAM node; see fsi.txt for details on
> +  FSI slave and CFAM nodes. This SBEFIFO engine provides an interface to the
> +  POWER processor Self Boot Engine (SBE).
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    enum:
> +      - ibm,p9-sbefifo
> +      - ibm,ody-sbefifo

Bit of a nitpick, but: Is there any argument against using
`ibm,odyssey-sbefifo`? Feels less cryptic.

Andrew