[PATCH 1/2] fsi: core: Lock scan mutex for master index removal
Joel Stanley
joel at jms.id.au
Wed May 31 17:47:54 AEST 2023
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 at 18:56, Eddie James <eajames at linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> If a master scan occurs while the master is being unregistered,
> the devicecs may end up with incorrect and possibly duplicate names,
typo: devices
> resulting in kernel warnings. Ensure the master index isn't changed
> outside of the scan mutex.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eddie James <eajames at linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/fsi/fsi-core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/fsi/fsi-core.c b/drivers/fsi/fsi-core.c
> index fcbf0469ce3f..18d4d68482d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/fsi/fsi-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/fsi/fsi-core.c
> @@ -1354,12 +1354,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fsi_master_register);
>
> void fsi_master_unregister(struct fsi_master *master)
> {
> + mutex_lock(&master->scan_lock);
The ida functions are supposed to not require locking, but protecting
against the test and changing of ->idx makes sense.
Do you want to add a Fixes: line?
> if (master->idx >= 0) {
> ida_simple_remove(&master_ida, master->idx);
the ida_simple functions are depreciated, at some point we should
replace them with ida_alloc/ida_free.
> master->idx = -1;
> }
>
> - mutex_lock(&master->scan_lock);
> fsi_master_unscan(master);
> mutex_unlock(&master->scan_lock);
> device_unregister(&master->dev);
> --
> 2.31.1
>
More information about the linux-fsi
mailing list