[PATCH] erofs: fix missing folio_unlock causing lock imbalance
Gao Xiang
hsiangkao at linux.alibaba.com
Tue Mar 31 13:58:58 AEDT 2026
On 2026/3/31 10:50, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Hi Zhan,
>
> On 2026/3/31 10:33, Zhan Xusheng wrote:
>> folio_trylock() in erofs_try_to_free_all_cached_folios() may
>> successfully acquire the folio lock, but the subsequent check
>> for erofs_folio_is_managed() can skip unlocking when the folio
>> is not managed by EROFS.
>
> Do you find some real timing?
>
> I don't think it can really happen, because:
>
>>
>> This leads to a lock imbalance and leaves the folio permanently
>> locked, which may cause reclaim stalls or interfere with memory
>> management.
>>
>> Fix this by ensuring folio_unlock() is called before continuing.
>
> If a folio links to a pcluster, folio->private will be non-NULL,
> and pcl->compressed_bvecs[i] points to that folios.
>
> And z_erofs_cache_release_folio() will be called with folio lock,
> and pcl->compressed_bvecs[i] will be set NULL here.
>
> So I don't think erofs_try_to_free_all_cached_folios() can find
> !erofs_folio_is_managed(sbi, folio) in the real world.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng at xiaomi.com>
>> ---
>> fs/erofs/zdata.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/erofs/zdata.c b/fs/erofs/zdata.c
>> index fe8121df9ef2..9d7ff22f1622 100644
>> --- a/fs/erofs/zdata.c
>> +++ b/fs/erofs/zdata.c
>> @@ -605,8 +605,10 @@ static int erofs_try_to_free_all_cached_folios(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi,
>> if (!folio_trylock(folio))
>> return -EBUSY;
>> - if (!erofs_folio_is_managed(sbi, folio))
>> + if (!erofs_folio_is_managed(sbi, folio)) {
>> + folio_unlock(folio);
>> continue;
>> + }
>> pcl->compressed_bvecs[i].page = NULL;
>> folio_detach_private(folio);
>
> But I admit that we should rewrite in function as:
>
> if (!erofs_folio_is_managed(sbi, folio)) {
> DBG_BUGON(1);
> } else {
> pcl->compressed_bvecs[i].page = NULL;
> folio_detach_private(folio);
> }
Or maybe just:
DBG_BUGON(!erofs_folio_is_managed(sbi, folio));
pcl->compressed_bvecs[i].page = NULL;
folio_detach_private(folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
Since if a pcluster goes here (!pcl->lockref.count),
`pcl->compressed_bvecs[i]` should leave all valid cached
folios (Or some should be recycled by .release_folio
instead.)
Unless there is the other bug somewhere, but in any case,
I don't think your phenomenon is related to EROFS.
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
> folio_unlock(folio);
>
> Thanks,
> Gao Xiang
>
>
>> folio_unlock(folio);
>
More information about the Linux-erofs
mailing list