[PATCH] erofs-utils: fix resource leaks and missing returns on error paths

[Nithurshen Karthikeyan]

On Sat, Mar 21, 2026 at 7:09 PM Gao Xiang <hsiangkao at linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> Any number is fine, or just use 99 when submitting.

Hi Xiang,

I've just sent out the new test case as erofs/099 in a separate
thread for the experimental-tests repository.

I verified the test logic in a Linux environment; it successfully
triggers a segmentation fault in the unpatched FUSE daemon due to
the double reply, and passes cleanly once Ajay's fix is applied.

Thanks and Regards
Nithurshen