[PATCH] erofs-utils: lib: validate h_shared_count in erofs_init_inode_xattrs()

Utkal Singh singhutkal015 at gmail.com
Tue Mar 17 22:34:08 AEDT 2026


Hi Gao Xiang,

Thanks for the review. I just sent v3 which uses the multiplication form as
you suggested.

Best regards, Utkal Singh

On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 at 17:00, Gao Xiang <hsiangkao at linux.alibaba.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 2026/3/17 19:17, Utkal Singh wrote:
> > erofs_init_inode_xattrs() reads h_shared_count from the on-disk xattr
> > ibody header and uses it to size a malloc and drive a loop that reads
> > shared xattr IDs.  If h_shared_count exceeds the space available
> > within xattr_isize, the loop reads past the intended ibody region
> > and the malloc is oversized.
> >
> > Validate that h_shared_count does not exceed the number of __le32
> > entries that fit after the ibody header.  Return -EFSCORRUPTED with
> > a diagnostic message on failure.
> >
> > Reproducer:
> >    mkdir testdir && echo hello > testdir/a.txt
> >    setfattr -n user.test -v val testdir/a.txt
> >    mkfs.erofs test.img testdir
> >    # corrupt h_shared_count (offset = nid*32 + inode_size + 4) to 0xFF
> >    # then: fsck.erofs --extract=/tmp/out --xattrs test_corrupted.img
> >    # Without patch: silently processes invalid shared xattr IDs
> >    # With patch: returns -EFSCORRUPTED
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Utkal Singh <singhutkal015 at gmail.com>
> > ---
> >   lib/xattr.c | 8 ++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/xattr.c b/lib/xattr.c
> > index 565070a..5888602 100644
> > --- a/lib/xattr.c
> > +++ b/lib/xattr.c
> > @@ -1182,6 +1182,14 @@ static int erofs_init_inode_xattrs(struct
> erofs_inode *vi)
> >
> >       ih = it.kaddr;
> >       vi->xattr_shared_count = ih->h_shared_count;
> > +     if (vi->xattr_shared_count >
> > +         (vi->xattr_isize - sizeof(struct erofs_xattr_ibody_header)) /
> > +         sizeof(__le32)) {
> > +             erofs_err("invalid h_shared_count %u in nid %llu",
> > +                       vi->xattr_shared_count, vi->nid | 0ULL);
> > +             erofs_put_metabuf(&it.buf);
> > +             return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> > +     }
>
> Again, why not `vi->xattr_shared_count * sizeof(__le32) >
>         vi->xattr_isize - sizeof(struct erofs_xattr_ibody_header)`?
>
> Thanks,
> Gao Xiang
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linux-erofs/attachments/20260317/9b32c915/attachment.htm>


More information about the Linux-erofs mailing list