[PATCH] erofs-utils: lib: validate z_extents against inode size

[Utkal Singh]

>
> Understood. Thanks for the detailed clarification.
>
> I see that large on-disk values can still be valid and that existing error
> handling (e.g., erofs_read_metabuf()) already handles boundary conditions
> appropriately.
>
> I will drop this approach and focus on identifying issues with concrete
> reproducers and clear impact under the current design.
>
> Thanks for your guidance.
>
> Utkal
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linux-erofs/attachments/20260317/9bdba3ff/attachment.htm>