[PATCH v3] erofs-utils: lib: fix 48bit addressing detection for chunk-based format
Gao Xiang
hsiangkao at linux.alibaba.com
Wed Feb 25 14:55:06 AEDT 2026
On 2026/2/25 03:13, puneeth_aditya_5656 wrote:
> The 48-bit chunk format flag was being set inside
> erofs_blob_write_chunked_file right after erofs_blob_getchunk returns.
> At that point chunk->blkaddr is the chunk's offset in the temporary
> blob buffer, not the final image address. The real address is only
> known after erofs_mkfs_dump_blobs applies remapped_base.
>
> This means the detection was unreliable in both directions: a chunk
> whose blob offset looks large but fits in 32-bits after remapping gets
> flagged unnecessarily, and worse, a chunk that lands above UINT32_MAX
I think the first case is impossible for the current remapping
mechanism.
> after remapping may not get flagged at all, producing a corrupt image.
>
> Fix this by introducing erofs_inode_fixup_chunkformat() which walks
> the chunk array after remapped_base is finalized and sets the 48-bit
> flag if any chunk address exceeds UINT32_MAX. The fixup is called from
> erofs_iflush so that the correct chunkformat is written into the
> on-disk inode header. Both blob chunks (remapped_base + chunk->blkaddr)
> and device chunks (chunk->blkaddr directly) are handled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Puneeth Aditya <myakampuneeth at gmail.com>
> ---
> include/erofs/blobchunk.h | 1 +
> lib/blobchunk.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> lib/inode.c | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/erofs/blobchunk.h b/include/erofs/blobchunk.h
> index ef06773..48fca63 100644
> --- a/include/erofs/blobchunk.h
> +++ b/include/erofs/blobchunk.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ extern "C"
>
> struct erofs_blobchunk *erofs_get_unhashed_chunk(unsigned int device_id,
> erofs_blk_t blkaddr, erofs_off_t sourceoffset);
> +void erofs_inode_fixup_chunkformat(struct erofs_inode *inode);
> int erofs_write_chunk_indexes(struct erofs_inode *inode, struct erofs_vfile *vf,
> erofs_off_t off);
> int erofs_blob_write_chunked_file(struct erofs_inode *inode, int fd,
> diff --git a/lib/blobchunk.c b/lib/blobchunk.c
> index a051904..96c161b 100644
> --- a/lib/blobchunk.c
> +++ b/lib/blobchunk.c
> @@ -136,6 +136,42 @@ static int erofs_blob_hashmap_cmp(const void *a, const void *b,
> sizeof(ec1->sha256));
> }
>
...
> +
> int erofs_write_chunk_indexes(struct erofs_inode *inode, struct erofs_vfile *vf,
> erofs_off_t off)
> {
> @@ -380,10 +416,6 @@ int erofs_blob_write_chunked_file(struct erofs_inode *inode, int fd,
> goto err;
> }
>
> - /* FIXME! `chunk->blkaddr` is not the final blkaddr here */
> - if (chunk->blkaddr != EROFS_NULL_ADDR &&
> - chunk->blkaddr >= UINT32_MAX)
> - inode->u.chunkformat |= EROFS_CHUNK_FORMAT_48BIT;
> if (!erofs_blob_can_merge(sbi, lastch, chunk)) {
> erofs_update_minextblks(sbi, interval_start, pos,
> &minextblks);
> diff --git a/lib/inode.c b/lib/inode.c
> index 4a214f9..25087ca 100644
> --- a/lib/inode.c
> +++ b/lib/inode.c
> @@ -794,6 +794,8 @@ int erofs_iflush(struct erofs_inode *inode)
> } else if (is_inode_layout_compression(inode)) {
> u1.blocks_lo = cpu_to_le32(inode->u.i_blocks);
> } else if (inode->datalayout == EROFS_INODE_CHUNK_BASED) {
> + if (inode->chunkindexes)
It's a useless check, just remove this.
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
More information about the Linux-erofs
mailing list