[PATCH] erofs-utils: lib: converted division to shift in z_erofs_load_compact_lcluster
Gao Xiang
hsiangkao at linux.alibaba.com
Wed Feb 25 04:49:16 AEDT 2026
Hi Ashley,
On 2026/2/25 00:30, Ashley Lee wrote:
> perf on fsck.erofs reports that z_erofs_load_compact_lcluster was
> spending 20% of its time doing the div instruction. While the function
> itself is ~40% of the fsck.erofs runtime. In the source code, it seems
> that the compiler can't optimize the division by vcnt despite it only
> holding powers of two.
>
> Running a benchmark on a lzma compressed freebsd source tree
> on x86 yields a ~3% increase in performance. The following
> test was run locally on an x86 machine.
>
> $ hyperfine -w 10 -p "echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches; sleep 1" \
> "./fsck.erofs ./bsd.erofs.lzma"
>
> With shift optimization
> Time (mean ± σ): 360.0 ms ± 12.0 ms \
> [User: 236.3 ms, System: 120.6 ms]
> Range (min … max): 342.3 ms … 379.8 ms 10 runs
>
> Original Dev Branch
> Time (mean ± σ): 371.1 ms ± 16.1 ms \
> [User: 254.8 ms, System: 115.0 ms]
> Range (min … max): 354.8 ms … 404.4 ms 10 runs
Which compiler are you using? Does both gcc and clang
behave the same?
I wonder if it's possible to refactor this a bit instead
of introducing another `vdiv`, also if the kernel
codebase behaves the same, we should improve the kernel too.
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
>
> Signed-off-by: Ashley Lee <yester1324 at gmail.com>
>
> ---
> lib/zmap.c | 15 +++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/zmap.c b/lib/zmap.c
> index baec278..1ba52b5 100644
> --- a/lib/zmap.c
> +++ b/lib/zmap.c
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static int z_erofs_load_compact_lcluster(struct z_erofs_maprecorder *m,
> const unsigned int lclusterbits = vi->z_lclusterbits;
> const unsigned int totalidx = BLK_ROUND_UP(sbi, vi->i_size);
> unsigned int compacted_4b_initial, compacted_2b, amortizedshift;
> - unsigned int vcnt, lo, lobits, encodebits, nblk, bytes;
> + unsigned int vcnt, vdiv, lo, lobits, encodebits, nblk, bytes;
> bool big_pcluster = vi->z_advise & Z_EROFS_ADVISE_BIG_PCLUSTER_1;
> erofs_off_t pos;
> u8 *in, type;
> @@ -144,13 +144,16 @@ static int z_erofs_load_compact_lcluster(struct z_erofs_maprecorder *m,
> pos += lcn * (1 << amortizedshift);
>
> /* figure out the lcluster count in this pack */
> - if (1 << amortizedshift == 4 && lclusterbits <= 14)
> + if (1 << amortizedshift == 4 && lclusterbits <= 14) {
> vcnt = 2;
> - else if (1 << amortizedshift == 2 && lclusterbits <= 12)
> + vdiv = 1;
> + } else if (1 << amortizedshift == 2 && lclusterbits <= 12) {
> vcnt = 16;
> - else
> + vdiv = 4;
> + } else {
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -
> + }
> +
> in = erofs_read_metabuf(&m->map->buf, sbi, pos,
> erofs_inode_in_metabox(vi));
> if (IS_ERR(in))
> @@ -160,7 +163,7 @@ static int z_erofs_load_compact_lcluster(struct z_erofs_maprecorder *m,
> m->nextpackoff = round_down(pos, vcnt << amortizedshift) +
> (vcnt << amortizedshift);
> lobits = max(lclusterbits, ilog2(Z_EROFS_LI_D0_CBLKCNT) + 1U);
> - encodebits = ((vcnt << amortizedshift) - sizeof(__le32)) * 8 / vcnt;
> + encodebits = (((vcnt << amortizedshift) - sizeof(__le32)) * 8) >> vdiv;
> bytes = pos & ((vcnt << amortizedshift) - 1);
> in -= bytes;
> i = bytes >> amortizedshift;
More information about the Linux-erofs
mailing list