[PATCH] fs/erofs: fix an integer overflow in symlink resolution
Gao Xiang
hsiangkao at linux.alibaba.com
Thu Feb 13 02:33:12 AEDT 2025
On 2025/2/12 22:17, Jonathan Bar Or wrote:
> This is good, but may I suggest using __builtin_add_overflow instead?
They are just the same.
erofs-utils follows the kernel style, mostly the kernel doesn't
directly use __builtin_add_overflow, instead it has a wrapper
check_add_overflow().
I could use __builtin_add_overflow for u-boot only.
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
>
> Jonathan
>
More information about the Linux-erofs
mailing list