[PATCH v2] erofs-utils: fsck: add --xattrs and --no-xattrs options
Hongzhen Luo
hongzhen at linux.alibaba.com
Tue Sep 3 21:10:32 AEST 2024
On 2024/9/3 17:32, Gao Xiang wrote:
>
>
> On 2024/9/3 16:56, Hongzhen Luo wrote:
>> The current `fsck --extract` does not support exporting the extended
>> attributes of files. This patch adds `--xattrs` option to dump the
>> extended attributes, as well as the `--no-xattrs` option to not dump
>> the extended attributes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hongzhen Luo <hongzhen at linux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>> v2: In addition to "--xattrs", the option "--no-xattrs" has been added.
>> v1:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240903073517.3311407-1-hongzhen@linux.alibaba.com/
>> ---
>> fsck/main.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fsck/main.c b/fsck/main.c
>> index 28f1e7e..273bf73 100644
>> --- a/fsck/main.c
>> +++ b/fsck/main.c
>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>> #include <utime.h>
>> #include <unistd.h>
>> #include <sys/stat.h>
>> +#include <sys/xattr.h>
>> #include "erofs/print.h"
>> #include "erofs/compress.h"
>> #include "erofs/decompress.h"
>> @@ -31,6 +32,7 @@ struct erofsfsck_cfg {
>> bool overwrite;
>> bool preserve_owner;
>> bool preserve_perms;
>> + bool dump_xattrs;
>> };
>> static struct erofsfsck_cfg fsckcfg;
>> @@ -48,6 +50,8 @@ static struct option long_options[] = {
>> {"no-preserve-owner", no_argument, 0, 10},
>> {"no-preserve-perms", no_argument, 0, 11},
>> {"offset", required_argument, 0, 12},
>> + {"xattrs", no_argument, 0, 13},
>> + {"no-xattrs", no_argument, 0, 14},
>> {0, 0, 0, 0},
>> };
>> @@ -98,6 +102,8 @@ static void usage(int argc, char **argv)
>> " --extract[=X] check if all files are well
>> encoded, optionally\n"
>> " extract to X\n"
>> " --offset=# skip # bytes at the beginning of
>> IMAGE\n"
>> + " --xattrs dump extended attributes (default)\n"
>> + " --no-xattrs do not dump extended attributes\n"
>> "\n"
>> " -a, -A, -y no-op, for compatibility with fsck
>> of other filesystems\n"
>> "\n"
>> @@ -225,6 +231,16 @@ static int erofsfsck_parse_options_cfg(int argc,
>> char **argv)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> break;
>> + case 13:
>> + if (!fsckcfg.dump_xattrs) {
>> + erofs_err("--xattrs conflicts with --no-xattrs");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>
> No need this, the latter option will override the previous ones.
>
>> + fsckcfg.dump_xattrs = true;
>> + break;
>> + case 14:
>> + fsckcfg.dump_xattrs = false;
>> + break;
>> default:
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> @@ -411,6 +427,57 @@ out:
>> return ret;
>> }
>> +static int erofsfsck_dump_xattrs(struct erofs_inode *inode)
>> +{
>> + char *keylst, *key;
>> + ssize_t kllen;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + kllen = erofs_listxattr(inode, NULL, 0);
>> + if (kllen <= 0)
>> + return kllen;
>> + keylst = malloc(kllen);
>> + if (!keylst)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + ret = erofs_listxattr(inode, keylst, kllen);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + goto out;
>> + for (key = keylst; key < keylst + kllen; key += strlen(key) + 1) {
>> + void *value = NULL;
>> + size_t size = 0;
>> +
>> + ret = erofs_getxattr(inode, key, NULL, 0);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + break;
>> + if (ret) {
>> + size = ret;
>> + value = malloc(size);
>> + if (!value) {
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>
> I think error message is needed here.
>
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + ret = erofs_getxattr(inode, key, value, size);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>
> Same here.
>
>> + free(value);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + if (fsckcfg.extract_path) {
>> + ret = setxattr(fsckcfg.extract_path, key, value,
>> + size, 0);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + free(value);
>
> It seems that is unneeded.
>
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + } else
>> + ret = 0;
>
> why not just
> if (ret) {
> erofs_err(...);
> break;
> }
>
> here?
>
Thanks for pointing this out. I will make the changes in the next version.
Thanks,
Hongzhen
>
>> + free(value);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +out:
>> + free(keylst);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int erofs_verify_inode_data(struct erofs_inode *inode, int
>> outfd)
>> {
>> struct erofs_map_blocks map = {
>> @@ -909,6 +976,12 @@ static int erofsfsck_check_inode(erofs_nid_t
>> pnid, erofs_nid_t nid)
>> if (ret && ret != -ECANCELED)
>> goto out;
>> + if (fsckcfg.dump_xattrs) {
>> + ret = erofsfsck_dump_xattrs(&inode);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> /* XXXX: the dir depth should be restricted in order to avoid
>> loops */
>> if (S_ISDIR(inode.i_mode)) {
>> struct erofs_dir_context ctx = {
>> @@ -955,6 +1028,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>> fsckcfg.overwrite = false;
>> fsckcfg.preserve_owner = fsckcfg.superuser;
>> fsckcfg.preserve_perms = fsckcfg.superuser;
>> + fsckcfg.dump_xattrs= true;
>
> Missing space.
>
> Thanks,
> Gao Xiang
>
>> err = erofsfsck_parse_options_cfg(argc, argv);
>> if (err) {
More information about the Linux-erofs
mailing list