[PATCH v2] erofs: free pclusters if no cached folio attached
Gao Xiang
hsiangkao at linux.alibaba.com
Mon Nov 11 13:25:29 AEDT 2024
Hi Chunhai,
On 2024/11/1 14:38, Chunhai Guo wrote:
> Once a pcluster is fully decompressed and there are no attached cached
> folios, its corresponding `struct z_erofs_pcluster` will be freed. This
> will significantly reduce the frequency of calls to erofs_shrink_scan()
> and the memory allocated for `struct z_erofs_pcluster`.
>
> The tables below show approximately a 96% reduction in the calls to
> erofs_shrink_scan() and in the memory allocated for `struct
> z_erofs_pcluster` after applying this patch. The results were obtained
> by performing a test to copy a 4.1GB partition on ARM64 Android devices
> running the 6.6 kernel with an 8-core CPU and 12GB of memory.
>
> 1. The reduction in calls to erofs_shrink_scan():
> +-----------------+-----------+----------+---------+
> | | w/o patch | w/ patch | diff |
> +-----------------+-----------+----------+---------+
> | Average (times) | 11390 | 390 | -96.57% |
> +-----------------+-----------+----------+---------+
>
> 2. The reduction in memory released by erofs_shrink_scan():
> +-----------------+-----------+----------+---------+
> | | w/o patch | w/ patch | diff |
> +-----------------+-----------+----------+---------+
> | Average (Byte) | 133612656 | 4434552 | -96.68% |
> +-----------------+-----------+----------+---------+
>
> Signed-off-by: Chunhai Guo <guochunhai at vivo.com>
> ---
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-erofs/588351c0-93f9-4a04-a923-15aae8b71d49@linux.alibaba.com/
> change since v1:
> - rebase this patch on "sunset z_erofs_workgroup` series
> - remove check on pcl->partial and get rid of `be->try_free`
> - update test results base on 6.6 kernel
> ---
> fs/erofs/zdata.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/zdata.c b/fs/erofs/zdata.c
> index 4558e6a98336..1a7f56259f45 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/zdata.c
> +++ b/fs/erofs/zdata.c
> @@ -896,14 +896,11 @@ static void z_erofs_rcu_callback(struct rcu_head *head)
> struct z_erofs_pcluster, rcu));
> }
>
> -static bool erofs_try_to_release_pcluster(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi,
> +static bool erofs_prepare_to_release_pcluster(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi,
> struct z_erofs_pcluster *pcl)
> {
> - int free = false;
> -
> - spin_lock(&pcl->lockref.lock);
> if (pcl->lockref.count)
> - goto out;
> + return false;
>
> /*
> * Note that all cached folios should be detached before deleted from
> @@ -911,7 +908,7 @@ static bool erofs_try_to_release_pcluster(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi,
> * orphan old pcluster when the new one is available in the tree.
> */
> if (erofs_try_to_free_all_cached_folios(sbi, pcl))
> - goto out;
> + return false;
>
> /*
> * It's impossible to fail after the pcluster is freezed, but in order
> @@ -920,8 +917,18 @@ static bool erofs_try_to_release_pcluster(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi,
> DBG_BUGON(__xa_erase(&sbi->managed_pslots, pcl->index) != pcl);
>
> lockref_mark_dead(&pcl->lockref);
> - free = true;
> -out:
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool erofs_try_to_release_pcluster(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi,
> + struct z_erofs_pcluster *pcl)
> +{
> + bool free = false;
> +
> + /* Using trylock to avoid deadlock with z_erofs_put_pcluster() */
> + if (!spin_trylock(&pcl->lockref.lock))
> + return free;
Thanks for the patch!
I think no need to move the common shrink path into trylock,
instead
> + free = erofs_prepare_to_release_pcluster(sbi, pcl);
> spin_unlock(&pcl->lockref.lock);
> if (free) {
> atomic_long_dec(&erofs_global_shrink_cnt);
> @@ -953,16 +960,27 @@ unsigned long z_erofs_shrink_scan(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi,
> return freed;
> }
>
> -static void z_erofs_put_pcluster(struct z_erofs_pcluster *pcl)
> +static void z_erofs_put_pcluster(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi,
> + struct z_erofs_pcluster *pcl, bool try_free)
> {
> + bool free = false;
> +
> if (lockref_put_or_lock(&pcl->lockref))
> return;
>
> DBG_BUGON(__lockref_is_dead(&pcl->lockref));
> - if (pcl->lockref.count == 1)
> - atomic_long_inc(&erofs_global_shrink_cnt);
> - --pcl->lockref.count;
> + if (--pcl->lockref.count == 0) {
> + if (try_free) {
I think here since we are really doing _try free_, so just
spin_unlock(&pcl->lockref.lock);
xa_lock(&sbi->managed_pslots);
free = erofs_try_to_release_pcluster(sbi, pcl);
xa_unlock(&sbi->managed_pslots);
is enough. IOWs, if other users race with it, I think the other user
will be responsible for this.
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
> + xa_lock(&sbi->managed_pslots);
> + free = erofs_prepare_to_release_pcluster(sbi, pcl);
> + xa_unlock(&sbi->managed_pslots);
> + }
> + if (!free)
> + atomic_long_inc(&erofs_global_shrink_cnt);
> + }
> spin_unlock(&pcl->lockref.lock);
> + if (free)
> + call_rcu(&pcl->rcu, z_erofs_rcu_callback);
More information about the Linux-erofs
mailing list