[PATCH v2] erofs-utils: fix the erofs_io_pread and erofs_io_pwrite
Gao Xiang
hsiangkao at linux.alibaba.com
Tue Jun 18 19:50:18 AEST 2024
On 2024/6/18 17:38, Hongzhen Luo wrote:
> When `vf->ops` is not null, `vf->ops->pread` returns the
> number of bytes successfully read, which is inconsistent
> with the semantics of `erofs_io_pread`. Similar situation
> occurs in `erofs_io_pwrite`. This fixes this issue.
>
> This also fixes `erofs_dev_close`.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hongzhen Luo <hongzhen at linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240617023433.3446706-1-hongzhen@linux.alibaba.com/
> ---
> include/erofs/internal.h | 5 ++++-
> lib/io.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/erofs/internal.h b/include/erofs/internal.h
> index f8a01ce..ed1fc92 100644
> --- a/include/erofs/internal.h
> +++ b/include/erofs/internal.h
> @@ -460,7 +460,10 @@ ssize_t erofs_dev_read(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi, int device_id,
> static inline int erofs_dev_write(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi, const void *buf,
> u64 offset, size_t len)
> {
> - return erofs_io_pwrite(&sbi->bdev, buf, offset, len);
> + ssize_t ret;
> +
> + ret = erofs_io_pwrite(&sbi->bdev, buf, offset, len);
> + return (size_t)ret == len ? 0 : (int)ret;
> }
>
> static inline int erofs_dev_fillzero(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi, u64 offset,
> diff --git a/lib/io.c b/lib/io.c
> index c523f00..0149d3b 100644
> --- a/lib/io.c
> +++ b/lib/io.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ ssize_t erofs_io_pwrite(struct erofs_vfile *vf, const void *buf,
> u64 pos, size_t len)
> {
> ssize_t ret;
> + size_t saved_len = len;
>
> if (unlikely(cfg.c_dry_run))
> return 0;
> @@ -53,7 +54,7 @@ ssize_t erofs_io_pwrite(struct erofs_vfile *vf, const void *buf,
> pos += ret;
> } while (len);
>
> - return 0;
> + return saved_len;
> }
>
> int erofs_io_fsync(struct erofs_vfile *vf)
> @@ -79,6 +80,7 @@ ssize_t erofs_io_fallocate(struct erofs_vfile *vf, u64 offset,
> {
> static const char zero[EROFS_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE] = {0};
> ssize_t ret;
> + ssize_t wret;
why not directly using ret here?
>
> if (unlikely(cfg.c_dry_run))
> return 0;
> @@ -92,13 +94,16 @@ ssize_t erofs_io_fallocate(struct erofs_vfile *vf, u64 offset,
> return 0;
> #endif
> while (len > EROFS_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE) {
> - ret = erofs_io_pwrite(vf, zero, offset, EROFS_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE);
> + wret = erofs_io_pwrite(vf, zero, offset, EROFS_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE);
> + ret = wret == EROFS_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE ? 0 : wret;
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> len -= EROFS_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE;
> offset += EROFS_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE;
> }
> - return erofs_io_pwrite(vf, zero, offset, len);
> + wret = erofs_io_pwrite(vf, zero, offset, len);
> + ret = wret == len ? 0 : wret;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> int erofs_io_ftruncate(struct erofs_vfile *vf, u64 length)
> @@ -126,6 +131,7 @@ int erofs_io_ftruncate(struct erofs_vfile *vf, u64 length)
> ssize_t erofs_io_pread(struct erofs_vfile *vf, void *buf, u64 pos, size_t len)
> {
> ssize_t ret;
> + size_t saved_len = len;
I really think you need to record the data read and
You don't address:
if (!ret) {
erofs_info("reach EOF of device");
memset(buf, 0, len);
return 0;
}
>
> if (unlikely(cfg.c_dry_run))
> return 0;
> @@ -156,7 +162,8 @@ ssize_t erofs_io_pread(struct erofs_vfile *vf, void *buf, u64 pos, size_t len)
> len -= ret;
> buf += ret;
> } while (len);
> - return 0;
> +
> + return saved_len;
> }
>
> static int erofs_get_bdev_size(int fd, u64 *bytes)
> @@ -287,7 +294,8 @@ out:
>
> void erofs_dev_close(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi)
> {
> - close(sbi->bdev.fd);
> + if (!sbi->bdev.ops)
> + close(sbi->bdev.fd);
> free(sbi->devname);
> sbi->devname = NULL;
> sbi->bdev.fd = -1;
> @@ -320,11 +328,18 @@ int erofs_blob_open_ro(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi, const char *dev)
> ssize_t erofs_dev_read(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi, int device_id,
> void *buf, u64 offset, size_t len)
> {
> - if (device_id)
> - return erofs_io_pread(&((struct erofs_vfile) {
> + ssize_t ret;
> +
> + if (device_id) {
> + ret = erofs_io_pread(&((struct erofs_vfile) {
> .fd = sbi->blobfd[device_id - 1],
> }), buf, offset, len);
> - return erofs_io_pread(&sbi->bdev, buf, offset, len);
> + return ret == len ? 0 : ret;
What's the meaning if ret > 0?
> +
> + }
> +
> + ret = erofs_io_pread(&sbi->bdev, buf, offset, len);
> + return ret == len ? 0 : ret;
Same here.
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
More information about the Linux-erofs
mailing list