[PATCH] erofs-utils: add I/O control for tarerofs stream via `erofs_vfile`
Hongzhen Luo
hongzhen at linux.alibaba.com
Tue Jun 11 18:06:08 AEST 2024
On 2024/6/11 16:00, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2024/6/11 15:54, Hongzhen Luo wrote:
>> This adds I/O control for tarerofs stream.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hongzhen Luo <hongzhen at linux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>> include/erofs/io.h | 1 +
>> include/erofs/tar.h | 2 +-
>> lib/tar.c | 16 ++++++++++------
>> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/erofs/io.h b/include/erofs/io.h
>> index c82dfdf..a501685 100644
>> --- a/include/erofs/io.h
>> +++ b/include/erofs/io.h
>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ struct erofs_vfile;
>> struct erofs_vfops {
>> int (*pread)(struct erofs_vfile *vf, void *buf, u64 offset,
>> size_t len);
>> + int (*read)(struct erofs_vfile *vf, void *buf, size_t len);
>
> I think you need to add both read and lseek.
>
>
>> int (*pwrite)(struct erofs_vfile *vf, const void *buf, u64
>> offset, size_t len);
>> int (*fsync)(struct erofs_vfile *vf);
>> int (*fallocate)(struct erofs_vfile *vf, u64 offset, size_t
>> len, bool pad);
>> diff --git a/include/erofs/tar.h b/include/erofs/tar.h
>> index b5c966b..e1de0df 100644
>> --- a/include/erofs/tar.h
>> +++ b/include/erofs/tar.h
>> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ struct erofs_iostream_liblzma {
>> struct erofs_iostream {
>> union {
>> - int fd; /* original fd */
>> + struct erofs_vfile vf;
>> void *handler;
>> #ifdef HAVE_LIBLZMA
>> struct erofs_iostream_liblzma *lzma;
>> diff --git a/lib/tar.c b/lib/tar.c
>> index 3514381..77e09ae 100644
>> --- a/lib/tar.c
>> +++ b/lib/tar.c
>> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ void erofs_iostream_close(struct erofs_iostream *ios)
>> #endif
>> return;
>> }
>> - close(ios->fd);
>> + close(ios->vf.fd);
>> }
>> int erofs_iostream_open(struct erofs_iostream *ios, int fd, int
>> decoder)
>> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ int erofs_iostream_open(struct erofs_iostream
>> *ios, int fd, int decoder)
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> #endif
>> } else {
>> - ios->fd = fd;
>> + ios->vf.fd = fd;
>> fsz = lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_END);
>> if (fsz <= 0) {
>> ios->feof = !fsz;
>> @@ -218,8 +218,12 @@ int erofs_iostream_read(struct erofs_iostream
>> *ios, void **buf, u64 bytes)
>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> #endif
>> } else {
>> - ret = erofs_read_from_fd(ios->fd, ios->buffer + rabytes,
>> - ios->bufsize - rabytes);
>> + if (ios->vf.ops)
>> + ret = ios->vf.ops->read(&ios->vf, ios->buffer +
>> rabytes,
>> + ios->bufsize - rabytes);
>> + else
>> + ret = erofs_read_from_fd(ios->vf.fd, ios->buffer +
>> rabytes,
>> + ios->bufsize - rabytes);
>
> I guess this could be moved into lib/io.c? and call erofs_io_read() here.
>
>> if (ret < 0)
>> return ret;
>> ios->tail += ret;
>> @@ -270,8 +274,8 @@ int erofs_iostream_lskip(struct erofs_iostream
>> *ios, u64 sz)
>> if (ios->feof)
>> return sz;
>> - if (ios->sz && likely(ios->dumpfd < 0)) {
>> - s64 cur = lseek(ios->fd, sz, SEEK_CUR);
>> + if (ios->sz && likely(ios->dumpfd < 0) && !ios->vf.ops) {
>> + s64 cur = lseek(ios->vf.fd, sz, SEEK_CUR);
>
> Same here, erofs_io_lseek is needed.
>
> Thanks,
> Gao Xiang
Ok, I will send a new version later.
---
Thanks,
Hongzhen Luo
More information about the Linux-erofs
mailing list