Fwd: [PATCHv5 1/1] block: introduce content activity based ioprio
Zhaoyang Huang
huangzhaoyang at gmail.com
Tue Jan 30 20:01:17 AEDT 2024
Dear erofs guys,
I would like to have you notice this commit which introduces an MGLRU
based ioprio feature which is proved to be effective in benchmark and
real scenarios. May I get any feedback from you if you are interested.
Thank you
ps: you can verify this patch by applying this patch, enable
CONFIG_CONTENT_ACT_BASED_IOPRIO and include the header file as below.
diff --git a/fs/erofs/zdata.c b/fs/erofs/zdata.c
index 036f610e044b..76bea610f699 100644
--- a/fs/erofs/zdata.c
+++ b/fs/erofs/zdata.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#include "compress.h"
#include <linux/psi.h>
#include <linux/cpuhotplug.h>
+#include <linux/act_ioprio.h>
#include <trace/events/erofs.h>
#define Z_EROFS_PCLUSTER_MAX_PAGES (Z_EROFS_PCLUSTER_MAX_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE)
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: zhaoyang.huang <zhaoyang.huang at unisoc.com>
Date: Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 4:43 PM
Subject: [PATCHv5 1/1] block: introduce content activity based ioprio
To: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org>, Jens Axboe
<axboe at kernel.dk>, Matthew Wilcox <willy at infradead.org>, Yu Zhao
<yuzhao at google.com>, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal at kernel.org>, Niklas
Cassel <niklas.cassel at wdc.com>, Martin K . Petersen
<martin.petersen at oracle.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare at suse.de>, Linus
Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>, <linux-mm at kvack.org>,
<linux-block at vger.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel at vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org>, Zhaoyang Huang
<huangzhaoyang at gmail.com>, <steve.kang at unisoc.com>
From: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang at unisoc.com>
Currently, request's ioprio are set via task's schedule priority(when no
blkcg configured), which has high priority tasks possess the privilege on
both of CPU and IO scheduling.
This commit works as a hint of original policy by promoting the request ioprio
based on the page/folio's activity. The original idea comes from LRU_GEN
which provides more precised folio activity than before. This commit try
to adjust the request's ioprio when certain part of its folios are hot,
which indicate that this request carry important contents and need be
scheduled ealier.
This commit is verified on a v6.6 6GB RAM android14 system via 4 test cases
by changing the bio_add_page/folio API in erofs, ext4 and f2fs in
another commit.
Case 1:
script[a] which get significant improved fault time as expected[b]
where dd's cost also shrink from 55s to 40s.
(1). fault_latency.bin is an ebpf based test tool which measure all task's
iowait latency during page fault when scheduled out/in.
(2). costmem generate page fault by mmaping a file and access the VA.
(3). dd generate concurrent vfs io.
[a]
./fault_latency.bin 1 5 > /data/dd_costmem &
costmem -c0 -a2048000 -b128000 -o0 1>/dev/null &
costmem -c0 -a2048000 -b128000 -o0 1>/dev/null &
costmem -c0 -a2048000 -b128000 -o0 1>/dev/null &
costmem -c0 -a2048000 -b128000 -o0 1>/dev/null &
dd if=/dev/block/sda of=/data/ddtest bs=1024 count=2048000 &
dd if=/dev/block/sda of=/data/ddtest1 bs=1024 count=2048000 &
dd if=/dev/block/sda of=/data/ddtest2 bs=1024 count=2048000 &
dd if=/dev/block/sda of=/data/ddtest3 bs=1024 count=2048000
[b]
mainline commit
io wait 836us 156us
Case 2:
fio -filename=/dev/block/by-name/userdata -rw=randread -direct=0
-bs=4k -size=2000M -numjobs=8 -group_reporting -name=mytest
mainline: 513MiB/s
READ: bw=531MiB/s (557MB/s), 531MiB/s-531MiB/s (557MB/s-557MB/s),
io=15.6GiB (16.8GB), run=30137-30137msec
READ: bw=543MiB/s (569MB/s), 543MiB/s-543MiB/s (569MB/s-569MB/s),
io=15.6GiB (16.8GB), run=29469-29469msec
READ: bw=474MiB/s (497MB/s), 474MiB/s-474MiB/s (497MB/s-497MB/s),
io=15.6GiB (16.8GB), run=33724-33724msec
READ: bw=535MiB/s (561MB/s), 535MiB/s-535MiB/s (561MB/s-561MB/s),
io=15.6GiB (16.8GB), run=29928-29928msec
READ: bw=523MiB/s (548MB/s), 523MiB/s-523MiB/s (548MB/s-548MB/s),
io=15.6GiB (16.8GB), run=30617-30617msec
READ: bw=492MiB/s (516MB/s), 492MiB/s-492MiB/s (516MB/s-516MB/s),
io=15.6GiB (16.8GB), run=32518-32518msec
READ: bw=533MiB/s (559MB/s), 533MiB/s-533MiB/s (559MB/s-559MB/s),
io=15.6GiB (16.8GB), run=29993-29993msec
READ: bw=524MiB/s (550MB/s), 524MiB/s-524MiB/s (550MB/s-550MB/s),
io=15.6GiB (16.8GB), run=30526-30526msec
READ: bw=529MiB/s (554MB/s), 529MiB/s-529MiB/s (554MB/s-554MB/s),
io=15.6GiB (16.8GB), run=30269-30269msec
READ: bw=449MiB/s (471MB/s), 449MiB/s-449MiB/s (471MB/s-471MB/s),
io=15.6GiB (16.8GB), run=35629-35629msec
commit: 633MiB/s
READ: bw=668MiB/s (700MB/s), 668MiB/s-668MiB/s (700MB/s-700MB/s),
io=15.6GiB (16.8GB), run=23952-23952msec
READ: bw=589MiB/s (618MB/s), 589MiB/s-589MiB/s (618MB/s-618MB/s),
io=15.6GiB (16.8GB), run=27164-27164msec
READ: bw=638MiB/s (669MB/s), 638MiB/s-638MiB/s (669MB/s-669MB/s),
io=15.6GiB (16.8GB), run=25071-25071msec
READ: bw=714MiB/s (749MB/s), 714MiB/s-714MiB/s (749MB/s-749MB/s),
io=15.6GiB (16.8GB), run=22409-22409msec
READ: bw=600MiB/s (629MB/s), 600MiB/s-600MiB/s (629MB/s-629MB/s),
io=15.6GiB (16.8GB), run=26669-26669msec
READ: bw=592MiB/s (621MB/s), 592MiB/s-592MiB/s (621MB/s-621MB/s),
io=15.6GiB (16.8GB), run=27036-27036msec
READ: bw=691MiB/s (725MB/s), 691MiB/s-691MiB/s (725MB/s-725MB/s),
io=15.6GiB (16.8GB), run=23150-23150msec
READ: bw=569MiB/s (596MB/s), 569MiB/s-569MiB/s (596MB/s-596MB/s),
io=15.6GiB (16.8GB), run=28142-28142msec
READ: bw=563MiB/s (590MB/s), 563MiB/s-563MiB/s (590MB/s-590MB/s),
io=15.6GiB (16.8GB), run=28429-28429msec
READ: bw=712MiB/s (746MB/s), 712MiB/s-712MiB/s (746MB/s-746MB/s),
io=15.6GiB (16.8GB), run=22478-22478msec
Case 3:
This commit is also verified by the case of launching camera APP which is
usually considered as heavy working load on both of memory and IO, which
shows 12%-24% improvement.
ttl = 0 ttl = 50 ttl = 100
mainline 2267ms 2420ms 2316ms
commit 1992ms 1806ms 1998ms
case 4:
androbench has no improvment as well as regression which supposed to be
its test time is short which MGLRU hasn't take effect yet.
Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang at unisoc.com>
---
change of v2: calculate page's activity via helper function
change of v3: solve layer violation by move API into mm
change of v4: keep block clean by removing the page related API
change of v5: introduce the macros of bio_add_folio/page for read dir.
---
---
include/linux/act_ioprio.h | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/uapi/linux/ioprio.h | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++
mm/Kconfig | 8 +++++
3 files changed, 106 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 include/linux/act_ioprio.h
diff --git a/include/linux/act_ioprio.h b/include/linux/act_ioprio.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ca7309b85758
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/act_ioprio.h
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note */
+#ifndef _ACT_IOPRIO_H
+#define _ACT_IOPRIO_H
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_CONTENT_ACT_BASED_IOPRIO
+#include <linux/bio.h>
+
+static __maybe_unused
+bool act_bio_add_folio(struct bio *bio, struct folio *folio, size_t len,
+ size_t off)
+{
+ int class, level, hint, activity;
+ bool ret;
+
+ ret = bio_add_folio(bio, folio, len, off);
+ if (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_READ && ret) {
+ class = IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS(bio->bi_ioprio);
+ level = IOPRIO_PRIO_LEVEL(bio->bi_ioprio);
+ hint = IOPRIO_PRIO_HINT(bio->bi_ioprio);
+ activity = IOPRIO_PRIO_ACTIVITY(bio->bi_ioprio);
+ activity += (activity < IOPRIO_NR_ACTIVITY &&
+ folio_test_workingset(folio)) ? 1 : 0;
+ if (activity >= bio->bi_vcnt / 2)
+ class = IOPRIO_CLASS_RT;
+ else if (activity >= bio->bi_vcnt / 4)
+ class =
max(IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS(get_current_ioprio()), IOPRIO_CLASS_BE);
+ activity = min(IOPRIO_NR_ACTIVITY - 1, activity);
+ bio->bi_ioprio = IOPRIO_PRIO_VALUE_ACTIVITY(class,
level, hint, activity);
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static __maybe_unused
+int act_bio_add_page(struct bio *bio, struct page *page,
+ unsigned int len, unsigned int offset)
+{
+ int class, level, hint, activity;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ ret = bio_add_page(bio, page, len, offset);
+ if (bio_op(bio) == REQ_OP_READ && ret > 0) {
+ class = IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS(bio->bi_ioprio);
+ level = IOPRIO_PRIO_LEVEL(bio->bi_ioprio);
+ hint = IOPRIO_PRIO_HINT(bio->bi_ioprio);
+ activity = IOPRIO_PRIO_ACTIVITY(bio->bi_ioprio);
+ activity += (activity < IOPRIO_NR_ACTIVITY &&
+ PageWorkingset(page)) ? 1 : 0;
+ if (activity >= bio->bi_vcnt / 2)
+ class = IOPRIO_CLASS_RT;
+ else if (activity >= bio->bi_vcnt / 4)
+ class =
max(IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS(get_current_ioprio()), IOPRIO_CLASS_BE);
+ activity = min(IOPRIO_NR_ACTIVITY - 1, activity);
+ bio->bi_ioprio = IOPRIO_PRIO_VALUE_ACTIVITY(class,
level, hint, activity);
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+#define bio_add_folio(bio, folio, len, off)
act_bio_add_folio(bio, folio, len, off)
+#define bio_add_page(bio, page, len, offset) act_bio_add_page(bio,
page, len, offset)
+#endif
+#endif
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ioprio.h b/include/uapi/linux/ioprio.h
index bee2bdb0eedb..64cf5ff0ac5f 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/ioprio.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/ioprio.h
@@ -71,12 +71,24 @@ enum {
* class and level.
*/
#define IOPRIO_HINT_SHIFT IOPRIO_LEVEL_NR_BITS
+#ifdef CONFIG_CONTENT_ACT_BASED_IOPRIO
+#define IOPRIO_HINT_NR_BITS 3
+#else
#define IOPRIO_HINT_NR_BITS 10
+#endif
#define IOPRIO_NR_HINTS (1 << IOPRIO_HINT_NR_BITS)
#define IOPRIO_HINT_MASK (IOPRIO_NR_HINTS - 1)
#define IOPRIO_PRIO_HINT(ioprio) \
(((ioprio) >> IOPRIO_HINT_SHIFT) & IOPRIO_HINT_MASK)
+#ifdef CONFIG_CONTENT_ACT_BASED_IOPRIO
+#define IOPRIO_ACTIVITY_SHIFT (IOPRIO_HINT_NR_BITS +
IOPRIO_LEVEL_NR_BITS)
+#define IOPRIO_ACTIVITY_NR_BITS 7
+#define IOPRIO_NR_ACTIVITY (1 << IOPRIO_ACTIVITY_NR_BITS)
+#define IOPRIO_ACTIVITY_MASK (IOPRIO_NR_ACTIVITY - 1)
+#define IOPRIO_PRIO_ACTIVITY(ioprio) \
+ (((ioprio) >> IOPRIO_ACTIVITY_SHIFT) & IOPRIO_ACTIVITY_MASK)
+#endif
/*
* I/O hints.
*/
@@ -104,6 +116,7 @@ enum {
#define IOPRIO_BAD_VALUE(val, max) ((val) < 0 || (val) >= (max))
+#ifndef CONFIG_CONTENT_ACT_BASED_IOPRIO
/*
* Return an I/O priority value based on a class, a level and a hint.
*/
@@ -123,5 +136,30 @@ static __always_inline __u16 ioprio_value(int
prioclass, int priolevel,
ioprio_value(prioclass, priolevel, IOPRIO_HINT_NONE)
#define IOPRIO_PRIO_VALUE_HINT(prioclass, priolevel, priohint) \
ioprio_value(prioclass, priolevel, priohint)
+#else
+/*
+ * Return an I/O priority value based on a class, a level, a hint and
+ * content's activities
+ */
+static __always_inline __u16 ioprio_value(int prioclass, int priolevel,
+ int priohint, int activity)
+{
+ if (IOPRIO_BAD_VALUE(prioclass, IOPRIO_NR_CLASSES) ||
+ IOPRIO_BAD_VALUE(priolevel, IOPRIO_NR_LEVELS) ||
+ IOPRIO_BAD_VALUE(priohint, IOPRIO_NR_HINTS) ||
+ IOPRIO_BAD_VALUE(activity, IOPRIO_NR_ACTIVITY))
+ return IOPRIO_CLASS_INVALID << IOPRIO_CLASS_SHIFT;
+ return (prioclass << IOPRIO_CLASS_SHIFT) |
+ (activity << IOPRIO_ACTIVITY_SHIFT) |
+ (priohint << IOPRIO_HINT_SHIFT) | priolevel;
+}
+
+#define IOPRIO_PRIO_VALUE(prioclass, priolevel) \
+ ioprio_value(prioclass, priolevel, IOPRIO_HINT_NONE, 0)
+#define IOPRIO_PRIO_VALUE_HINT(prioclass, priolevel, priohint) \
+ ioprio_value(prioclass, priolevel, priohint, 0)
+#define IOPRIO_PRIO_VALUE_ACTIVITY(prioclass, priolevel, priohint,
activity) \
+ ioprio_value(prioclass, priolevel, priohint, activity)
+#endif
#endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_IOPRIO_H */
diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
index 264a2df5ecf5..e0e5a5a44ded 100644
--- a/mm/Kconfig
+++ b/mm/Kconfig
@@ -1240,6 +1240,14 @@ config LRU_GEN_STATS
from evicted generations for debugging purpose.
This option has a per-memcg and per-node memory overhead.
+
+config CONTENT_ACT_BASED_IOPRIO
+ bool "Enable content activity based ioprio"
+ depends on LRU_GEN
+ default n
+ help
+ This item enable the feature of adjust bio's priority by
+ calculating its content's activity.
# }
config ARCH_SUPPORTS_PER_VMA_LOCK
--
2.25.1
More information about the Linux-erofs
mailing list