[PATCH 00/10] netfs, afs, cifs, cachefiles, erofs: Miscellaneous fixes
Jeff Layton
jlayton at kernel.org
Tue Jan 23 02:57:38 AEDT 2024
On Mon, 2024-01-22 at 12:38 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> Here are some miscellaneous fixes for netfslib and a number of filesystems:
>
> (1) Replace folio_index() with folio->index in netfs, afs and cifs.
>
> (2) Fix an oops in fscache_put_cache().
>
> (3) Fix error handling in netfs_perform_write().
>
> (4) Fix an oops in cachefiles when not using erofs ondemand mode.
>
> (5) In afs, hide silly-rename files from getdents() to avoid problems with
> tar and suchlike.
>
> (6) In afs, fix error handling in lookup with a bulk status fetch.
>
> (7) In afs, afs_dynroot_d_revalidate() is redundant, so remove it.
>
> (8) In afs, fix the RCU unlocking in afs_proc_addr_prefs_show().
>
> The patches can also be found here:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/log/?h=netfs-fixes
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> Dan Carpenter (2):
> netfs, fscache: Prevent Oops in fscache_put_cache()
> netfs: Fix a NULL vs IS_ERR() check in netfs_perform_write()
>
> David Howells (8):
> netfs: Don't use certain internal folio_*() functions
> afs: Don't use certain internal folio_*() functions
> cifs: Don't use certain internal folio_*() functions
> cachefiles, erofs: Fix NULL deref in when cachefiles is not doing
> ondemand-mode
> afs: Hide silly-rename files from userspace
> afs: Fix error handling with lookup via FS.InlineBulkStatus
> afs: Remove afs_dynroot_d_revalidate() as it is redundant
> afs: Fix missing/incorrect unlocking of RCU read lock
>
> fs/afs/dir.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> fs/afs/dynroot.c | 9 ---------
> fs/afs/proc.c | 5 +++--
> fs/cachefiles/namei.c | 16 ++++++++++------
> fs/netfs/buffered_read.c | 12 ++++++------
> fs/netfs/buffered_write.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> fs/netfs/fscache_cache.c | 3 ++-
> fs/netfs/io.c | 2 +-
> fs/netfs/misc.c | 2 +-
> fs/smb/client/file.c | 10 +++++-----
> include/trace/events/afs.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 11 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
These all look fine to me. You can add this to the set:
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton at kernel.org>
More information about the Linux-erofs
mailing list