Patch "erofs: reliably distinguish block based and fscache mode" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree

Greg KH gregkh at linuxfoundation.org
Fri Dec 6 22:24:32 AEDT 2024


On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 06:37:54PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2024/12/6 18:03, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 05:41:11PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > > 
> > > On 2024/12/6 17:33, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 01:05:21PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> > > > > Hi XiangYu,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Just noticed that. Why it's needed for Linux 6.1 LTS?
> > > > > Just see my reply, I think 6.1 LTS is not impacted:
> > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/686626cd-7dcd-4931-bf55-108522b9bfeb@linux.alibaba.com/
> > > > > 
> > > > > Also, it seems some dependenies are missing, just
> > > > > backporting this commit will break EROFS.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hi Greg,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Please help drop this patch from 6.1 queue before more
> > > > > explanations, thanks!
> > > > 
> > > > Now dropped, sorry about that.
> > > 
> > > No need sorry :-) just wonder the cases why we backport
> > > this commit.
> > 
> > It was done so explicitly here:
> > 	https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241129074059.925789-1-xiangyu.chen@eng.windriver.com
> > 
> > The submitter should have cc:ed the developers involved, I'll try to
> > poke them to do that in the future.
> 
> I received that email but ignored it accidently‌, I meant
> I just wonder the original reason on the Xiangyu's side.
> Is there something wrong in the production?

I have no idea, Xiangyu would have to answer that.


More information about the Linux-erofs mailing list