[PATCH RFC v2 2/2] erofs: apply the page cache share feature
Hongbo Li
lihongbo22 at huawei.com
Thu Aug 1 22:43:37 AEST 2024
On 2024/7/31 16:07, Hongzhen Luo wrote:
> This modifies relevant functions to apply the page cache
> share feature.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hongzhen Luo <hongzhen at linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> v2: Make adjustments based on the latest implementation.
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240722065355.1396365-5-hongzhen@linux.alibaba.com/
> ---
> fs/erofs/inode.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/erofs/super.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/inode.c b/fs/erofs/inode.c
> index 5f6439a63af7..9f1e7332cff9 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/erofs/inode.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> * Copyright (C) 2021, Alibaba Cloud
> */
> #include "xattr.h"
> +#include "pagecache_share.h"
>
> #include <trace/events/erofs.h>
>
> @@ -229,10 +230,22 @@ static int erofs_fill_inode(struct inode *inode)
> switch (inode->i_mode & S_IFMT) {
> case S_IFREG:
> inode->i_op = &erofs_generic_iops;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_EROFS_FS_PAGE_CACHE_SHARE
> + erofs_pcs_fill_inode(inode);
> +#endif
> if (erofs_inode_is_data_compressed(vi->datalayout))
> inode->i_fop = &generic_ro_fops;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_EROFS_FS_PAGE_CACHE_SHARE
> + else {
If the compress data is not support, the erofs_pcs_fill_inode should
fill the fingerprint in this branch only.
> + if (vi->fprt_len > 0)
> + inode->i_fop = &erofs_pcs_file_fops;
> + else
> + inode->i_fop = &erofs_file_fops;
> + }
> +#else
> else
> inode->i_fop = &erofs_file_fops;
> +#endif
> break;
> case S_IFDIR:
> inode->i_op = &erofs_dir_iops;
> @@ -325,6 +338,16 @@ struct inode *erofs_iget(struct super_block *sb, erofs_nid_t nid)
> return ERR_PTR(err);
> }
> unlock_new_inode(inode);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_EROFS_FS_PAGE_CACHE_SHARE
> + if ((inode->i_mode & S_IFMT) == S_IFREG &&may be S_ISREG macro is better.
> + EROFS_I(inode)->fprt_len > 0) {
Perhaps this logic need to be enclosed within unlock_new_inode.
> + err = erofs_pcs_add(inode);
> + if (err) {
> + iget_failed(inode);
> + return ERR_PTR(err);
> + }
> + }
> +#endif
> }
> return inode;
> }
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/super.c b/fs/erofs/super.c
> index 35268263aaed..a42e65ef7fc7 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/erofs/super.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include <linux/fs_parser.h>
> #include <linux/exportfs.h>
> #include "xattr.h"
> +#include "pagecache_share.h"
>
> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> #include <trace/events/erofs.h>
> @@ -95,6 +96,10 @@ static struct inode *erofs_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
>
> /* zero out everything except vfs_inode */
> memset(vi, 0, offsetof(struct erofs_inode, vfs_inode));
> +#ifdef CONFIG_EROFS_FS_PAGE_CACHE_SHARE
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vi->pcs_list);
> + init_rwsem(&vi->pcs_rwsem);
> +#endif
> return &vi->vfs_inode;
> }
>
> @@ -108,6 +113,21 @@ static void erofs_free_inode(struct inode *inode)
> kmem_cache_free(erofs_inode_cachep, vi);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_EROFS_FS_PAGE_CACHE_SHARE
> +static void erofs_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> + struct erofs_inode *vi = EROFS_I(inode);
> +
> + if ((inode->i_mode & S_IFMT) == S_IFREG &&
using S_ISREG macro is better.
> + EROFS_I(inode)->fprt_len > 0) {
> + if (erofs_pcs_remove(inode))
> + erofs_err(inode->i_sb, "pcs: fail to remove inode.");
> + kfree(vi->fprt);
> + vi->fprt = NULL;
> + }
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> static bool check_layout_compatibility(struct super_block *sb,
> struct erofs_super_block *dsb)
> {
> @@ -937,6 +957,9 @@ static int erofs_show_options(struct seq_file *seq, struct dentry *root)
> const struct super_operations erofs_sops = {
> .put_super = erofs_put_super,
> .alloc_inode = erofs_alloc_inode,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_EROFS_FS_PAGE_CACHE_SHARE
> + .destroy_inode = erofs_destroy_inode,
> +#endif
> .free_inode = erofs_free_inode,
> .statfs = erofs_statfs,
> .show_options = erofs_show_options,
More information about the Linux-erofs
mailing list