[PATCH 03/12] cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd()
Baokun Li
libaokun at huaweicloud.com
Thu Apr 25 11:33:44 AEST 2024
Hi Jia,
On 2024/4/24 22:55, Jia Zhu wrote:
>
>
> 在 2024/4/24 11:39, libaokun at huaweicloud.com 写道:
>> From: Baokun Li <libaokun1 at huawei.com>
>>
>> We got the following issue in a fuzz test of randomly issuing the
>> restore
>> command:
>>
>> ==================================================================
>> BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in
>> cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0x609/0xab0
>> Write of size 4 at addr ffff888109164a80 by task ondemand-04-dae/4962
>>
>> CPU: 11 PID: 4962 Comm: ondemand-04-dae Not tainted 6.8.0-rc7-dirty #542
>> Call Trace:
>> kasan_report+0x94/0xc0
>> cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0x609/0xab0
>> vfs_read+0x169/0xb50
>> ksys_read+0xf5/0x1e0
>>
>> Allocated by task 626:
>> __kmalloc+0x1df/0x4b0
>> cachefiles_ondemand_send_req+0x24d/0x690
>> cachefiles_create_tmpfile+0x249/0xb30
>> cachefiles_create_file+0x6f/0x140
>> cachefiles_look_up_object+0x29c/0xa60
>> cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x37d/0xca0
>> fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x43c/0x1230
>> [...]
>>
>> Freed by task 626:
>> kfree+0xf1/0x2c0
>> cachefiles_ondemand_send_req+0x568/0x690
>> cachefiles_create_tmpfile+0x249/0xb30
>> cachefiles_create_file+0x6f/0x140
>> cachefiles_look_up_object+0x29c/0xa60
>> cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x37d/0xca0
>> fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x43c/0x1230
>> [...]
>> ==================================================================
>>
>> Following is the process that triggers the issue:
>>
>> mount | daemon_thread1 | daemon_thread2
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> cachefiles_ondemand_init_object
>> cachefiles_ondemand_send_req
>> REQ_A = kzalloc(sizeof(*req) + data_len)
>> wait_for_completion(&REQ_A->done)
>>
>> cachefiles_daemon_read
>> cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
>> REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
>> cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd
>> copy_to_user(_buffer, msg, n)
>> process_open_req(REQ_A)
>> ------ restore ------
>> cachefiles_ondemand_restore
>> xas_for_each(&xas, req, ULONG_MAX)
>> xas_set_mark(&xas,
>> CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW);
>>
>> cachefiles_daemon_read
>> cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
>> REQ_A =
>> cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
>>
>> write(devfd, ("copen %u,%llu", msg->msg_id, size));
>> cachefiles_ondemand_copen
>> xa_erase(&cache->reqs, id)
>> complete(&REQ_A->done)
>> kfree(REQ_A)
>> cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd(REQ_A)
>> fd = get_unused_fd_flags
>> file = anon_inode_getfile
>> fd_install(fd, file)
>> load = (void *)REQ_A->msg.data;
>> load->fd = fd;
>> // load UAF !!!
>>
>> This issue is caused by issuing a restore command when the daemon is
>> still
>> alive, which results in a request being processed multiple times thus
>> triggering a UAF. So to avoid this problem, add an additional reference
>> count to cachefiles_req, which is held while waiting and reading, and
>> then
>> released when the waiting and reading is over.
>
> Hi Baokun,
> Thank you for catching this issue. Shall we fix this by following steps:
> cachefiles_ondemand_fd_release()
> xas_for_each(req)
> if req is not CACHEFILES_OP_READ
> flush
>
> cachefiles_ondemand_restore()
> xas_for_each(req)
> if req is not CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW && op is (OPEN or CLOSE)
> reset req to CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW
>
> By implementing these steps:
> 1. In real daemon failover case： only pending read reqs will be
> reserved. cachefiles_ondemand_select_req will reopen the object by
> processing READ req.
> 2. In daemon alive case： Only read reqs will be reset to
> CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW.
>
This way, in the fialover case, some processes that are being mounted
will fail, which is contrary to our intention of making the user senseless.
In my opinion, it's better to keep making users senseless.
Thanks,
Baokun
>
>>
>> Note that since there is only one reference count for waiting, we
>> need to
>> avoid the same request being completed multiple times, so we can only
>> complete the request if it is successfully removed from the xarray.
>>
>> Fixes: e73fa11a356c ("cachefiles: add restore command to recover
>> inflight ondemand read requests")
>> Suggested-by: Hou Tao <houtao1 at huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1 at huawei.com>
>> ---
>> fs/cachefiles/internal.h | 1 +
>> fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/internal.h b/fs/cachefiles/internal.h
>> index d33169f0018b..7745b8abc3aa 100644
>> --- a/fs/cachefiles/internal.h
>> +++ b/fs/cachefiles/internal.h
>> @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ static inline bool
>> cachefiles_in_ondemand_mode(struct cachefiles_cache *cache)
>> struct cachefiles_req {
>> struct cachefiles_object *object;
>> struct completion done;
>> + refcount_t ref;
>> int error;
>> struct cachefiles_msg msg;
>> };
>> diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c b/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
>> index fd49728d8bae..56d12fe4bf73 100644
>> --- a/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
>> +++ b/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
>> @@ -4,6 +4,12 @@
>> #include <linux/uio.h>
>> #include "internal.h"
>> +static inline void cachefiles_req_put(struct cachefiles_req *req)
>> +{
>> + if (refcount_dec_and_test(&req->ref))
>> + kfree(req);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int cachefiles_ondemand_fd_release(struct inode *inode,
>> struct file *file)
>> {
>> @@ -299,7 +305,6 @@ ssize_t cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read(struct
>> cachefiles_cache *cache,
>> {
>> struct cachefiles_req *req;
>> struct cachefiles_msg *msg;
>> - unsigned long id = 0;
>> size_t n;
>> int ret = 0;
>> XA_STATE(xas, &cache->reqs, cache->req_id_next);
>> @@ -330,41 +335,39 @@ ssize_t cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read(struct
>> cachefiles_cache *cache,
>> xas_clear_mark(&xas, CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW);
>> cache->req_id_next = xas.xa_index + 1;
>> + refcount_inc(&req->ref);
>> xa_unlock(&cache->reqs);
>> - id = xas.xa_index;
>> -
>> if (msg->opcode == CACHEFILES_OP_OPEN) {
>> ret = cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd(req);
>> if (ret) {
>> cachefiles_ondemand_set_object_close(req->object);
>> - goto error;
>> + goto out;
>> }
>> }
>> - msg->msg_id = id;
>> + msg->msg_id = xas.xa_index;
>> msg->object_id = req->object->ondemand->ondemand_id;
>> if (copy_to_user(_buffer, msg, n) != 0) {
>> ret = -EFAULT;
>> if (msg->opcode == CACHEFILES_OP_OPEN)
>> close_fd(((struct cachefiles_open *)msg->data)->fd);
>> - goto error;
>> }
>> -
>> - /* CLOSE request has no reply */
>> - if (msg->opcode == CACHEFILES_OP_CLOSE) {
>> - xa_erase(&cache->reqs, id);
>> - complete(&req->done);
>> +out:
>> + /* Remove error request and CLOSE request has no reply */
>> + if (ret || msg->opcode == CACHEFILES_OP_CLOSE) {
>> + xas_reset(&xas);
>> + xas_lock(&xas);
>> + if (xas_load(&xas) == req) {
>> + req->error = ret;
>> + complete(&req->done);
>> + xas_store(&xas, NULL);
>> + }
>> + xas_unlock(&xas);
>> }
>> -
>> - return n;
>> -
>> -error:
>> - xa_erase(&cache->reqs, id);
>> - req->error = ret;
>> - complete(&req->done);
>> - return ret;
>> + cachefiles_req_put(req);
>> + return ret ? ret : n;
>> }
>> typedef int (*init_req_fn)(struct cachefiles_req *req, void
>> *private);
>> @@ -394,6 +397,7 @@ static int cachefiles_ondemand_send_req(struct
>> cachefiles_object *object,
>> goto out;
>> }
>> + refcount_set(&req->ref, 1);
>> req->object = object;
>> init_completion(&req->done);
>> req->msg.opcode = opcode;
>> @@ -455,7 +459,7 @@ static int cachefiles_ondemand_send_req(struct
>> cachefiles_object *object,
>> wake_up_all(&cache->daemon_pollwq);
>> wait_for_completion(&req->done);
>> ret = req->error;
>> - kfree(req);
>> + cachefiles_req_put(req);
>> return ret;
>> out:
>> /* Reset the object to close state in error handling path.
More information about the Linux-erofs
mailing list