[PATCH] erofs-utils: fsck: add support for extracting hard links
Yue Hu
zbestahu at gmail.com
Tue Jun 27 23:11:44 AEST 2023
On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 17:47:33 +0800
Gao Xiang <hsiangkao at linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> Hi Yue,
>
> On 2023/6/27 16:53, Yue Hu wrote:
> > From: Yue Hu <huyue2 at coolpad.com>
> >
> > Currently hard links can't be extracted correctly, let's support it now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huyue2 at coolpad.com>
>
> Thanks for the patch! Some minor comments below...
>
> > ---
> > fsck/main.c | 152 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 124 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fsck/main.c b/fsck/main.c
> > index f816bec..e78f67c 100644
> > --- a/fsck/main.c
> > +++ b/fsck/main.c
> > @@ -49,6 +49,16 @@ static struct option long_options[] = {
> > {0, 0, 0, 0},
> > };
> >
> > +#define NR_HARDLINK_HASHTABLE 16384
> > +
> > +struct hardlink_entry {
>
> erofsfsck_hardlink_entry {
>
> or erofsfsck_linkentry if the above is too long
>
> > + struct list_head list;
> > + erofs_nid_t nid;
> > + char *path;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct list_head hardlink_hashtable[NR_HARDLINK_HASHTABLE];
>
> erofsfsck_link_hashtable
>
> > +
> > static void print_available_decompressors(FILE *f, const char *delim)
> > {
> > unsigned int i = 0;
> > @@ -550,6 +560,64 @@ static inline int erofs_extract_dir(struct erofs_inode *inode)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static char *erofsfsck_hardlink_find(erofs_nid_t nid)
> > +{
> > + struct list_head *head =
> > + &hardlink_hashtable[nid % NR_HARDLINK_HASHTABLE];
> > + struct hardlink_entry *entry;
> > +
> > + if (list_empty(head))
> > + return NULL;
>
> why we need that?
yeah, it's unneeded, will remove it in v2.
>
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(entry, head, list)
> > + if (entry->nid == nid)
> > + return entry->path;
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int erofsfsck_hardlink_insert(erofs_nid_t nid, const char *path)
> > +{
> > + struct hardlink_entry *entry;
> > +
> > + entry = malloc(sizeof(*entry));
> > + if (!entry)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + entry->nid = nid;
> > + entry->path = strdup(path);
> > + if (!entry->path)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + list_add_tail(&entry->list,
> > + &hardlink_hashtable[nid % NR_HARDLINK_HASHTABLE]);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void erofsfsck_hardlink_init(void)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < NR_HARDLINK_HASHTABLE; ++i)
> > + init_list_head(&hardlink_hashtable[i]);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void erofsfsck_hardlink_exit(void)
> > +{
> > + struct hardlink_entry *entry, *n;
> > + struct list_head *head;
> > + unsigned int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < NR_HARDLINK_HASHTABLE; ++i) {
> > + head = &hardlink_hashtable[i];
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, n, head, list) {
> > + if (entry->path)
> > + free(entry->path);
> > + free(entry);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline int erofs_extract_file(struct erofs_inode *inode)
> > {
> > bool tryagain = true;
> > @@ -719,6 +787,57 @@ static int erofsfsck_dirent_iter(struct erofs_dir_context *ctx)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +static int erofsfsck_extract_inode(struct erofs_inode *inode)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > + char *oldpath;
> > +
> > + if (!fsckcfg.extract_path || erofs_is_packed_inode(inode)) {
>
> why introducing erofs_is_packed_inode here?
hardlink hashtable will be initialized after verify packed inode.
>
> Thanks,
> Gao Xiang
More information about the Linux-erofs
mailing list