[PATCH v5] erofs: add per-cpu threads for decompression as an option
Gao Xiang
hsiangkao at linux.alibaba.com
Tue Feb 28 16:01:43 AEDT 2023
Hi Sandeep,
On 2023/2/28 12:47, Sandeep Dhavale via Linux-erofs wrote:
> Hi all,
> I completed the tests and the results are consistent with
> our previous observation. We can see that removing WQ_UNBOUND
> helps but the scheduling latency by using high priority per cpu
> kthreads is even lower. Below is the table.
>
> |---------------------+-------+-------+------+-------|
> | Table | avg | med | min | max |
> |---------------------+-------+-------+------+-------|
> | Default erofs | 19323 | 19758 | 3986 | 35051 |
> |---------------------+-------+-------+------+-------|
> | !WQ_UNBOUND | 11202 | 10798 | 3493 | 19822 |
> |---------------------+-------+-------+------+-------|
> | hipri pcpu kthreads | 7182 | 7017 | 2463 | 12300 |
> |---------------------+-------+-------+------+-------|
May I ask did it test with different setup since the test results
in the original commit message are:
+-------------------------+-----------+----------------+---------+
| | workqueue | kthread_worker | diff |
+-------------------------+-----------+----------------+---------+
| Average (us) | 15253 | 2914 | -80.89% |
| Median (us) | 14001 | 2912 | -79.20% |
| Minimum (us) | 3117 | 1027 | -67.05% |
| Maximum (us) | 30170 | 3805 | -87.39% |
| Standard deviation (us) | 7166 | 359 | |
+-------------------------+-----------+----------------+---------+
Otherwise it looks good to me for now, hopefully helpful to Android
users.
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
>
>
> Thanks,
> Sandeep.
More information about the Linux-erofs
mailing list