[PATCH v4 05/23] cachefiles: introduce new devnode for on-demand read mode
Greg KH
gregkh at linuxfoundation.org
Thu Feb 17 04:48:11 AEDT 2022
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 08:49:35PM +0800, JeffleXu wrote:
> >> +struct cachefiles_req_in {
> >> + uint64_t id;
> >> + uint64_t off;
> >> + uint64_t len;
> >
> > For structures that cross the user/kernel boundry, you have to use the
> > correct types. For this it would be __u64.
>
> OK I will change to __xx style in the next version.
>
> By the way, I can't understand the disadvantage of uintxx_t style.
The "uint*" types are not valid kernel types. They are userspace types
and do not transfer properly in all arches and situations when crossing
the user/kernel boundry. They are also in a different C "namespace", so
should not even be used in kernel code, although a lot of people do
because they are used to writing userspace C code :(
thanks,
greg k-h
More information about the Linux-erofs
mailing list