[PATCH v4 05/23] cachefiles: introduce new devnode for on-demand read mode

Greg KH gregkh at linuxfoundation.org
Thu Feb 17 04:48:11 AEDT 2022


On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 08:49:35PM +0800, JeffleXu wrote:
> >> +struct cachefiles_req_in {
> >> +	uint64_t id;
> >> +	uint64_t off;
> >> +	uint64_t len;
> > 
> > For structures that cross the user/kernel boundry, you have to use the
> > correct types.  For this it would be __u64.
> 
> OK I will change to __xx style in the next version.
> 
> By the way, I can't understand the disadvantage of uintxx_t style.

The "uint*" types are not valid kernel types.  They are userspace types
and do not transfer properly in all arches and situations when crossing
the user/kernel boundry.  They are also in a different C "namespace", so
should not even be used in kernel code, although a lot of people do
because they are used to writing userspace C code :(

thanks,

greg k-h


More information about the Linux-erofs mailing list