[PATCH v2 1/3] fs/erofs: add erofs filesystem support

[Tom Rini]

On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 08:36:44PM +0800, Huang Jianan wrote:

> From: Huang Jianan <huangjianan at oppo.com>
> 
> This patch mainly deals with uncompressed files.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Huang Jianan <huangjianan at oppo.com>
> ---
>  fs/Kconfig          |   1 +
>  fs/Makefile         |   1 +
>  fs/erofs/Kconfig    |  12 ++
>  fs/erofs/Makefile   |   7 +
>  fs/erofs/data.c     | 124 ++++++++++++++
>  fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h | 384 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  fs/erofs/fs.c       | 231 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  fs/erofs/internal.h | 203 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  fs/erofs/namei.c    | 238 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  fs/erofs/super.c    |  65 ++++++++
>  fs/fs.c             |  22 +++
>  include/erofs.h     |  19 +++
>  include/fs.h        |   1 +
>  13 files changed, 1308 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 fs/erofs/Kconfig
>  create mode 100644 fs/erofs/Makefile
>  create mode 100644 fs/erofs/data.c
>  create mode 100644 fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
>  create mode 100644 fs/erofs/fs.c
>  create mode 100644 fs/erofs/internal.h
>  create mode 100644 fs/erofs/namei.c
>  create mode 100644 fs/erofs/super.c
>  create mode 100644 include/erofs.h

Do the style problems checkpatch.pl complains about here match what's in
the linux kernel?  I expect at lease some of them come from using custom
debug/etc macros rather than the standard logging functions.  Thanks.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linux-erofs/attachments/20210825/25b9e39f/attachment.sig>