[PATCH] staging: erofs: remove needless CONFIG_EROFS_FS_SECURITY
Yue Hu
zbestahu at gmail.com
Thu Jun 20 19:29:55 AEST 2019
On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 17:22:48 +0800
Chao Yu <yuchao0 at huawei.com> wrote:
> On 2019/6/20 16:32, Gao Xiang wrote:
> > Hi Yue,
> >
> > On 2019/6/20 16:30, Yue Hu wrote:
> >> From: Yue Hu <huyue2 at yulong.com>
> >>
> >> erofs_xattr_security_handler is already marked __maybe_unused, no need
> >> to add CONFIG_EROFS_FS_SECURITY condition.
>
> CONFIG_EROFS_FS_SECURITY is used as a control switch of erofs security labels
> feature, but __maybe_unused is to avoid unneeded compiler warning on unused
> variable, so I think we can't remove it.
However, erofs_xattr_security_handler will not unused under CONFIG_EROFS_FS_SECURITY
condition, right?
Thx.
>
> Thanks,
>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huyue2 at yulong.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/staging/erofs/xattr.c | 2 --
> >> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/erofs/xattr.c b/drivers/staging/erofs/xattr.c
> >> index df40654..06024ac 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/staging/erofs/xattr.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/erofs/xattr.c
> >> @@ -499,13 +499,11 @@ static int erofs_xattr_generic_get(const struct xattr_handler *handler,
> >> .get = erofs_xattr_generic_get,
> >> };
> >>
> >> -#ifdef CONFIG_EROFS_FS_SECURITY
> >> const struct xattr_handler __maybe_unused erofs_xattr_security_handler = {
> >> .prefix = XATTR_SECURITY_PREFIX,
> >> .flags = EROFS_XATTR_INDEX_SECURITY,
> >> .get = erofs_xattr_generic_get,
> >> };
> >> -#endif
> >
> > Thanks for your patch.
> >
> > In that case...erofs_xattr_security_handler could be compiled into .rodata section?
> > I am not sure...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Gao Xiang
> >
> >>
> >> const struct xattr_handler *erofs_xattr_handlers[] = {
> >> &erofs_xattr_user_handler,
> >>
> > .
> >
More information about the Linux-erofs
mailing list