[PATCH] staging: erofs: remove needless CONFIG_EROFS_FS_SECURITY

Yue Hu zbestahu at gmail.com
Thu Jun 20 19:29:55 AEST 2019


On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 17:22:48 +0800
Chao Yu <yuchao0 at huawei.com> wrote:

> On 2019/6/20 16:32, Gao Xiang wrote:
> > Hi Yue,
> > 
> > On 2019/6/20 16:30, Yue Hu wrote:  
> >> From: Yue Hu <huyue2 at yulong.com>
> >>
> >> erofs_xattr_security_handler is already marked __maybe_unused, no need
> >> to add CONFIG_EROFS_FS_SECURITY condition.  
> 
> CONFIG_EROFS_FS_SECURITY is used as a control switch of erofs security labels
> feature, but __maybe_unused is to avoid unneeded compiler warning on unused
> variable, so I think we can't remove it.

However, erofs_xattr_security_handler will not unused under CONFIG_EROFS_FS_SECURITY
condition, right?

Thx.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huyue2 at yulong.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/staging/erofs/xattr.c | 2 --
> >>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/erofs/xattr.c b/drivers/staging/erofs/xattr.c
> >> index df40654..06024ac 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/staging/erofs/xattr.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/erofs/xattr.c
> >> @@ -499,13 +499,11 @@ static int erofs_xattr_generic_get(const struct xattr_handler *handler,
> >>  	.get	= erofs_xattr_generic_get,
> >>  };
> >>  
> >> -#ifdef CONFIG_EROFS_FS_SECURITY
> >>  const struct xattr_handler __maybe_unused erofs_xattr_security_handler = {
> >>  	.prefix	= XATTR_SECURITY_PREFIX,
> >>  	.flags	= EROFS_XATTR_INDEX_SECURITY,
> >>  	.get	= erofs_xattr_generic_get,
> >>  };
> >> -#endif  
> > 
> > Thanks for your patch.
> > 
> > In that case...erofs_xattr_security_handler could be compiled into .rodata section?
> > I am not sure...
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Gao Xiang
> >   
> >>  
> >>  const struct xattr_handler *erofs_xattr_handlers[] = {
> >>  	&erofs_xattr_user_handler,
> >>  
> > .
> >   



More information about the Linux-erofs mailing list