[RFCv2] erofs-utils: on-disk extent format for blocks.
Gao Xiang
gaoxiang25 at huawei.com
Tue Dec 31 19:11:55 AEDT 2019
Hi Pratik,
On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 04:18:05PM +0530, Pratik Shinde wrote:
> Tracking only the data-extents + some minor naming changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pratik Shinde <pratikshinde320 at gmail.com>
> ---
> include/erofs/internal.h | 20 ++++++-
> lib/inode.c | 151 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 2 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/erofs/internal.h b/include/erofs/internal.h
> index e13adda..5a29a67 100644
> --- a/include/erofs/internal.h
> +++ b/include/erofs/internal.h
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ struct erofs_sb_info {
> extern struct erofs_sb_info sbi;
>
> struct erofs_inode {
> - struct list_head i_hash, i_subdirs, i_xattrs;
> + struct list_head i_hash, i_subdirs, i_xattrs, i_sparse_extents;
>
> unsigned int i_count;
> struct erofs_inode *i_parent;
> @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ struct erofs_inode {
>
> unsigned int xattr_isize;
> unsigned int extent_isize;
> + unsigned int sparse_extent_isize;
>
> erofs_nid_t nid;
> struct erofs_buffer_head *bh;
> @@ -139,5 +140,22 @@ static inline const char *erofs_strerror(int err)
> return msg;
> }
>
> +/* on disk extent format */
On disk extent format is not useful...
> +struct erofs_extent {
Maybe add _sparse_ in order to distinguish from compress extents...
struct erofs_sparse_extent
> + __le32 ee_lblk;
> + __le32 ee_pblk;
> + __le32 ee_len;
> +};
How about moving all on-disk format to erofs_fs.h?
> +
> +struct erofs_extent_node {
struct erofs_sparse_extent_node {
> + struct list_head next;
> + erofs_blk_t lblk;
> + erofs_blk_t pblk;
> + u32 len;
> +};
> +
> +struct erofs_inline_extent_header {
struct erofs_sparse_extent_iheader {
> + u32 count;
> +};
> #endif
>
> diff --git a/lib/inode.c b/lib/inode.c
> index 0e19b11..01ac54f 100644
> --- a/lib/inode.c
> +++ b/lib/inode.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,98 @@ static unsigned char erofs_type_by_mode[S_IFMT >> S_SHIFT] = {
>
> struct list_head inode_hashtable[NR_INODE_HASHTABLE];
>
> +
> +#define IS_HOLE(start, end) (roundup(start, EROFS_BLKSIZ) == start && \
> + roundup(end, EROFS_BLKSIZ) == end && \
> + (end - start) % EROFS_BLKSIZ == 0)
It is used only once, how about getting rid of this macro
helper and add some comments above it?
> +
> +/* returns the number of holes present in the file */
> +unsigned int erofs_read_extents(struct erofs_inode *inode,
> + struct list_head *extents)
erofs_sparse_read_extents()?
> +{
> + int fd, st, dt, en;
maybe it'd better have some meaningful names...
> + unsigned int nholes = 0;
> + erofs_off_t data, hole, len = 0, last_data;
> + struct erofs_extent_node *e_data;
> +
> + fd = open(inode->i_srcpath, O_RDONLY);
It is more preferred to reuse the previous fd?
> + if (fd < 0)
> + return -errno;
> + len = lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_END);
> + if (len < 0)
> + goto fail;
> + if (lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_SET) == -1)
> + goto fail;
> + data = 0;
> + last_data = 0;
> + while (data < len) {
> + hole = lseek(fd, data, SEEK_HOLE);
> + if (hole == len)
> + break;
> + data = lseek(fd, hole, SEEK_DATA);
> + if (data < 0 || hole > data) {
> + close(fd);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + if (IS_HOLE(hole, data)) {
> + st = erofs_blknr(hole);
> + dt = erofs_blknr(last_data);
> + en = erofs_blknr(data);
> + last_data = data;
> + e_data = malloc(sizeof(struct erofs_extent_node));
> + if (e_data == NULL)
> + goto fail;
> + e_data->lblk = dt;
> + e_data->len = (st - dt);
> + list_add_tail(&e_data->next, extents);
> + nholes += (en - st);
> + }
> + }
> + /* rounddown to exclude tail-end data */
> + if (last_data < len && (len - last_data) >= EROFS_BLKSIZ) {
> + e_data = malloc(sizeof(struct erofs_extent_node));
> + if (e_data == NULL)
> + goto fail;
> + st = erofs_blknr(last_data);
> + e_data->lblk = st;
> + e_data->len = erofs_blknr(rounddown((len - last_data),
> + EROFS_BLKSIZ));
> + list_add_tail(&e_data->next, extents);
> + }
> + return nholes;
> +
> +fail: close(fd);
Leave the label in a single line...
And if we reuse fd, we could omit close(fd) as well..
> + return -errno;
> +}
> +
> +char *erofs_create_extent_buffer(struct list_head *extents, unsigned int size)
How about
int erofs_sparse_write_extents(struct erofs_inode *inode, erofs_off_t off)
{
...
ret = blk_write(buf, off, inode->sparse_extent_isize);
...
free(buf);
return ret;
}
> +{
> + struct erofs_extent_node *e_node;
> + struct erofs_inline_extent_header *header;
> + char *buf;
> + unsigned int p = 0;
> +
> + buf = malloc(size);
> + if (buf == NULL)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> + header = (struct erofs_inline_extent_header *) buf;
> + header->count = 0;
> + p += sizeof(struct erofs_inline_extent_header);
> + list_for_each_entry(e_node, extents, next) {
> + const struct erofs_extent ee = {
> + .ee_lblk = cpu_to_le32(e_node->lblk),
> + .ee_pblk = cpu_to_le32(e_node->pblk),
> + .ee_len = cpu_to_le32(e_node->len)
> + };
> + memcpy(buf + p, &ee, sizeof(struct erofs_extent));
> + p += sizeof(struct erofs_extent);
> + header->count++;
> + list_del(&e_node->next);
> + free(e_node);
> + }
> + return buf;
> +}
> +
> void erofs_inode_manager_init(void)
> {
> unsigned int i;
> @@ -304,8 +396,9 @@ static bool erofs_file_is_compressible(struct erofs_inode *inode)
>
> int erofs_write_file(struct erofs_inode *inode)
> {
> - unsigned int nblocks, i;
> + unsigned int nblocks, i, j, nholes;
> int ret, fd;
> + struct erofs_extent_node *e_node;
>
> if (!inode->i_size) {
> inode->datalayout = EROFS_INODE_FLAT_PLAIN;
> @@ -322,31 +415,38 @@ int erofs_write_file(struct erofs_inode *inode)
> /* fallback to all data uncompressed */
> inode->datalayout = EROFS_INODE_FLAT_INLINE;
> nblocks = inode->i_size / EROFS_BLKSIZ;
> -
> - ret = __allocate_inode_bh_data(inode, nblocks);
> + nholes = erofs_read_extents(inode, &inode->i_sparse_extents);
> + if (nholes < 0)
> + return nholes;
> + ret = __allocate_inode_bh_data(inode, nblocks - nholes);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> -
> fd = open(inode->i_srcpath, O_RDONLY | O_BINARY);
> if (fd < 0)
> return -errno;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < nblocks; ++i) {
> - char buf[EROFS_BLKSIZ];
> -
> - ret = read(fd, buf, EROFS_BLKSIZ);
> - if (ret != EROFS_BLKSIZ) {
> - if (ret < 0)
> + i = inode->u.i_blkaddr;
> + inode->sparse_extent_isize = sizeof(struct erofs_inline_extent_header);
> + list_for_each_entry(e_node, &inode->i_sparse_extents, next) {
> + inode->sparse_extent_isize += sizeof(struct erofs_extent);
> + e_node->pblk = i;
> + ret = lseek(fd, blknr_to_addr(e_node->lblk), SEEK_SET);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto fail;
> + for (j = 0; j < e_node->len; j++) {
> + char buf[EROFS_BLKSIZ];
> + ret = read(fd, buf, EROFS_BLKSIZ);
> + if (ret != EROFS_BLKSIZ) {
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto fail;
> + close(fd);
> + return -EAGAIN;
> + }
> + ret = blk_write(buf, e_node->pblk + j, 1);
> + if (ret)
> goto fail;
> - close(fd);
> - return -EAGAIN;
> }
> -
> - ret = blk_write(buf, inode->u.i_blkaddr + i, 1);
> - if (ret)
> - goto fail;
> + i += e_node->len;
> }
> -
> /* read the tail-end data */
> inode->idata_size = inode->i_size % EROFS_BLKSIZ;
> if (inode->idata_size) {
> @@ -479,8 +579,19 @@ static bool erofs_bh_flush_write_inode(struct erofs_buffer_head *bh)
> if (ret)
> return false;
> free(inode->compressmeta);
> + off += inode->extent_isize;
> }
>
> + if (inode->sparse_extent_isize) {
> + char *extents = erofs_create_extent_buffer(&inode->i_sparse_extents,
> + inode->sparse_extent_isize);
> + if (IS_ERR(extents))
> + return false;
> + ret = dev_write(extents, off, inode->sparse_extent_isize);
> + if (ret)
> + return false;
> + free(extents);
ret = erofs_sparse_write_extents(inode, off);
if (ret)
return false;
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
> + }
> inode->bh = NULL;
> erofs_iput(inode);
> return erofs_bh_flush_generic_end(bh);
> @@ -737,10 +848,11 @@ struct erofs_inode *erofs_new_inode(void)
>
> init_list_head(&inode->i_subdirs);
> init_list_head(&inode->i_xattrs);
> + init_list_head(&inode->i_sparse_extents);
>
> inode->idata_size = 0;
> inode->xattr_isize = 0;
> - inode->extent_isize = 0;
> + inode->sparse_extent_isize = 0;
>
> inode->bh = inode->bh_inline = inode->bh_data = NULL;
> inode->idata = NULL;
> @@ -961,4 +1073,3 @@ struct erofs_inode *erofs_mkfs_build_tree_from_path(struct erofs_inode *parent,
>
> return erofs_mkfs_build_tree(inode);
> }
> -
> --
> 2.9.3
>
More information about the Linux-erofs
mailing list