[PATCH 1/2] erofs: on-disk format should have explicitly assigned numbers

[Gao Xiang]

As Christoph claimed [1], on-disk format should have
explicitly assigned numbers.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829095954.GB20598@infradead.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25 at huawei.com>
---
 fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
index afa7d45ca958..2447ad4d0920 100644
--- a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
+++ b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h
@@ -52,10 +52,10 @@ struct erofs_super_block {
  * 4~7 - reserved
  */
 enum {
-	EROFS_INODE_FLAT_PLAIN,
-	EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION_LEGACY,
-	EROFS_INODE_FLAT_INLINE,
-	EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION,
+	EROFS_INODE_FLAT_PLAIN			= 0,
+	EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION_LEGACY	= 1,
+	EROFS_INODE_FLAT_INLINE			= 2,
+	EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION		= 3,
 	EROFS_INODE_LAYOUT_MAX
 };
 
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ struct erofs_xattr_entry {
 
 /* available compression algorithm types */
 enum {
-	Z_EROFS_COMPRESSION_LZ4,
+	Z_EROFS_COMPRESSION_LZ4	= 0,
 	Z_EROFS_COMPRESSION_MAX
 };
 
@@ -239,10 +239,10 @@ struct z_erofs_map_header {
  *                (di_advise could be 0, 1 or 2)
  */
 enum {
-	Z_EROFS_VLE_CLUSTER_TYPE_PLAIN,
-	Z_EROFS_VLE_CLUSTER_TYPE_HEAD,
-	Z_EROFS_VLE_CLUSTER_TYPE_NONHEAD,
-	Z_EROFS_VLE_CLUSTER_TYPE_RESERVED,
+	Z_EROFS_VLE_CLUSTER_TYPE_PLAIN		= 0,
+	Z_EROFS_VLE_CLUSTER_TYPE_HEAD		= 1,
+	Z_EROFS_VLE_CLUSTER_TYPE_NONHEAD	= 2,
+	Z_EROFS_VLE_CLUSTER_TYPE_RESERVED	= 3,
 	Z_EROFS_VLE_CLUSTER_TYPE_MAX
 };
 
-- 
2.17.1