[PATCH v2] erofs-utils: code for handling incorrect debug level.
Pratik Shinde
pratikshinde320 at gmail.com
Sun Aug 4 20:33:49 AEST 2019
Hi Gao,
I used fprintf here because we are printing this error message in case of
invalid 'cfg.c_dbg_lvl'. Hence I thought
we cannot rely on erofs_err().
e.g
$ mkfs.erofs -d -1 <erofs image> <directory>
In this case debug level is '-1' which is invalid.If we try to print the
error message using erofs_err() with c_dbg_lvl = -1,
it will not print anything.
While applying the minor fixup, just reset the c_dbg_lvl to 0 , so that
erofs_err() will be able to log the error message.
--Pratik.
On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 3:47 PM Gao Xiang <hsiangkao at aol.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 01:49:43PM +0530, Pratik Shinde wrote:
> > handling the case of incorrect debug level.
> > Added an enumerated type for supported debug levels.
> > Using 'atoi' in place of 'parse_num_from_str'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pratik Shinde <pratikshinde320 at gmail.com>
> > ---
> > include/erofs/print.h | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> > mkfs/main.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
> > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/erofs/print.h b/include/erofs/print.h
> > index bc0b8d4..296cbbf 100644
> > --- a/include/erofs/print.h
> > +++ b/include/erofs/print.h
> > @@ -12,6 +12,15 @@
> > #include "config.h"
> > #include <stdio.h>
> >
> > +enum {
> > + EROFS_MSG_MIN = 0,
> > + EROFS_ERR = 0,
> > + EROFS_WARN = 2,
> > + EROFS_INFO = 3,
> > + EROFS_DBG = 7,
> > + EROFS_MSG_MAX = 9
> > +};
> > +
> > #define FUNC_LINE_FMT "%s() Line[%d] "
> >
> > #ifndef pr_fmt
> > @@ -19,7 +28,7 @@
> > #endif
> >
> > #define erofs_dbg(fmt, ...) do { \
> > - if (cfg.c_dbg_lvl >= 7) { \
> > + if (cfg.c_dbg_lvl >= EROFS_DBG) { \
> > fprintf(stdout, \
> > pr_fmt(fmt), \
> > __func__, \
> > @@ -29,7 +38,7 @@
> > } while (0)
> >
> > #define erofs_info(fmt, ...) do { \
> > - if (cfg.c_dbg_lvl >= 3) { \
> > + if (cfg.c_dbg_lvl >= EROFS_INFO) { \
> > fprintf(stdout, \
> > pr_fmt(fmt), \
> > __func__, \
> > @@ -40,7 +49,7 @@
> > } while (0)
> >
> > #define erofs_warn(fmt, ...) do { \
> > - if (cfg.c_dbg_lvl >= 2) { \
> > + if (cfg.c_dbg_lvl >= EROFS_WARN) { \
> > fprintf(stdout, \
> > pr_fmt(fmt), \
> > __func__, \
> > @@ -51,7 +60,7 @@
> > } while (0)
> >
> > #define erofs_err(fmt, ...) do { \
> > - if (cfg.c_dbg_lvl >= 0) { \
> > + if (cfg.c_dbg_lvl >= EROFS_ERR) { \
> > fprintf(stderr, \
> > "Err: " pr_fmt(fmt), \
> > __func__, \
> > @@ -64,4 +73,3 @@
> >
> >
> > #endif
> > -
> > diff --git a/mkfs/main.c b/mkfs/main.c
> > index fdb65fd..d915d00 100644
> > --- a/mkfs/main.c
> > +++ b/mkfs/main.c
> > @@ -30,16 +30,6 @@ static void usage(void)
> > fprintf(stderr, " -EX[,...] X=extended options\n");
> > }
> >
> > -u64 parse_num_from_str(const char *str)
> > -{
> > - u64 num = 0;
> > - char *endptr = NULL;
> > -
> > - num = strtoull(str, &endptr, 10);
> > - BUG_ON(num == ULLONG_MAX);
> > - return num;
> > -}
> > -
> > static int parse_extended_opts(const char *opts)
> > {
> > #define MATCH_EXTENTED_OPT(opt, token, keylen) \
> > @@ -108,7 +98,14 @@ static int mkfs_parse_options_cfg(int argc, char
> *argv[])
> > break;
> >
> > case 'd':
> > - cfg.c_dbg_lvl = parse_num_from_str(optarg);
> > + cfg.c_dbg_lvl = atoi(optarg);
> > + if (cfg.c_dbg_lvl < EROFS_MSG_MIN
> > + || cfg.c_dbg_lvl > EROFS_MSG_MAX) {
> > + fprintf(stderr,
> > + "invalid debug level %d\n",
> > + cfg.c_dbg_lvl);
>
> How about using erofs_err as my previous patch attached?
> I wonder if there are some specfic reasons to directly use fprintf instead?
>
> I will apply it with this minor fixup (no need to resend again), if you
> have
> other considerations, reply me in this thread, thanks. :)
>
> Thanks,
> Gao Xiang
>
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > break;
> >
> > case 'E':
> > --
> > 2.9.3
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linux-erofs/attachments/20190804/f5d04a4e/attachment.htm>
More information about the Linux-erofs
mailing list