[PATCH v3 4/4] staging: erofs: option validation in remount

Gao Xiang gaoxiang25 at huawei.com
Wed Sep 19 16:56:02 AEST 2018


Hi Chengguang,

On 2018/9/19 0:58, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Hi Chengguang,
> 
> On 2018/9/18 23:10, Chengguang Xu wrote:
>> Add option validation in remount. After this patch, remount
>> can change recognized options, and for unknown options remount
>> will fail and report error.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519 at gmx.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0 at huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/staging/erofs/super.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/erofs/super.c b/drivers/staging/erofs/super.c
>> index a091b93190e1..30b6b44dc6c4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/erofs/super.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/erofs/super.c
>> @@ -145,14 +145,10 @@ char *erofs_fault_name[FAULT_MAX] = {
>>  	[FAULT_KMALLOC]		= "kmalloc",
>>  };
>>  
>> -static int erofs_build_fault_attr(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi,
>> -					substring_t *args)
>> +static void __erofs_build_fault_attr(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi,
>> +						unsigned int rate)
>>  {
>>  	struct erofs_fault_info *ffi = &sbi->fault_info;
>> -	int rate = 0;
>> -
>> -	if (args->from && match_int(args, &rate))
>> -		return -EINVAL;
>>  
>>  	if (rate) {
>>  		atomic_set(&ffi->inject_ops, 0);
>> @@ -163,14 +159,29 @@ static int erofs_build_fault_attr(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi,
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	set_opt(sbi, FAULT_INJECTION);
>> -	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>>  static unsigned int erofs_get_fault_rate(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi)
>>  {
>>  	return sbi->fault_info.inject_rate;
>>  }
>> +
>> +static int erofs_build_fault_attr(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi, substring_t *args)
>> +{
>> +	int rate = 0;
>> +
>> +	if (args->from && match_int(args, &rate))
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	__erofs_build_fault_attr(sbi, rate);
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>>  #else
>> +static void __erofs_build_fault_attr(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi,
>> +						unsigned int rate)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int erofs_build_fault_attr(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi,
>>  					substring_t *args)
>>  {
>> @@ -644,10 +655,23 @@ static int erofs_show_options(struct seq_file *seq, struct dentry *root)
>>  
>>  static int erofs_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
>>  {
>> +	struct erofs_sb_info *sbi = EROFS_SB(sb);
>> +	unsigned int org_mnt_opt = sbi->mount_opt;
>> +	unsigned int org_inject_rate = erofs_get_fault_rate(sbi);
>> +	int err;
>> +
>>  	BUG_ON(!sb_rdonly(sb));
>> +	err = parse_options(sb, data);
>> +	if (err)
>> +		goto out;
>>  
>>  	*flags |= MS_RDONLY;
> I cannot apply this patch since the above line has been changed in
> 5f0abea6ab6d("staging: erofs: rename superblock flags (MS_xyz -> SB_xyz)").
> 
> 
> And two more checkpatch CHECKs as [PATCH v3 2/4]
> 
> CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> #141: FILE: drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:149:
> +static void __erofs_build_fault_attr(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi,
> +                                               unsigned int rate)
> 
> CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> #175: FILE: drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:181:
> +static void __erofs_build_fault_attr(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi,
> +                                               unsigned int rate)
> 
> And I think I need to test the basic erofs remount function tomorrow
> before merging... it is too late and I have to go to sleep now.
I tested just now, and seems good. :)

Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25 at huawei.com>

and look forward to your final patchset.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang


More information about the Linux-erofs mailing list