[PATCH 08/11] erofs: support special inode
Chao Yu
chao at kernel.org
Tue Jul 3 23:48:19 AEST 2018
Hi Xiang,
On 2018/7/3 13:31, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Hi Guifu and Chao,
>
> On 2018/6/22 10:01, Chao Yu wrote:
>> This patch adds to support special inode, such as block dev, char,
>> socket, pipe inode.
>>
>
> To Guifu,
>
> Could you test this patch based on your latest _erofs_mkfs_ which supports special inodes?
> --- either for device files, named pipe files or socket files.
>
> If this patch works fine, could you also reply with a "Tested-by:" tag?
>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0 at huawei.com>
>> ---
>> fs/erofs/inode.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> fs/erofs/internal.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/erofs/inode.c b/fs/erofs/inode.c
>> index 94e827b57a5b..3dbce0cf41ff 100644
>> --- a/fs/erofs/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/erofs/inode.c
>> @@ -30,8 +30,16 @@ static int read_inode(struct inode *inode, void *data)
>> vi->inode_isize = sizeof(struct erofs_inode_v2);
>> vi->xattr_isize = ondisk_xattr_ibody_size(v2->i_xattr_icount);
>>
>> - vi->raw_blkaddr = le32_to_cpu(v2->i_u.raw_blkaddr);
>> inode->i_mode = le16_to_cpu(v2->i_mode);
>> + if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) ||
>> + S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode)) {
>> + vi->raw_blkaddr = le32_to_cpu(v2->i_u.raw_blkaddr);
>> + } else if (S_ISCHR(inode->i_mode) || S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode)) {
>> + inode->i_rdev =
>> + new_decode_dev(le32_to_cpu(v2->i_u.rdev));
>> + } else if (S_ISFIFO(inode->i_mode) || S_ISSOCK(inode->i_mode)) {
>> + inode->i_rdev = 0;
>> + }
> To Chao,
>
> It seems a default case missing here, and an error handling could be also added...
Yes, that's right, let me add it.
>
> How about returning -EIO and furthermore
> BUG_ON if CONFIG_EROFS_FS_DEBUG is enabled as well ?
> (for commercial integrated test, it is hard to detect those error if just -EIO is returned.)
>
> 18 config EROFS_FS_DEBUG
> 19 bool "EROFS debugging feature"
> 20 depends on EROFS_FS
> 21 help
> 22 Print erofs debugging messages and enable more BUG_ONs
> 23 which check the filesystem consistency aggressively.
> 24
> 25 For daily use, say N.
>
> So will the rest error handling code, I think.
> How do you think?
> If you also agree with that, let's add them gradually in the future.
Yes, agree, that will be kind to erofs developers or testers to find bugs,
please go ahead. :)
>
>>
>> i_uid_write(inode, le32_to_cpu(v2->i_uid));
>> i_gid_write(inode, le32_to_cpu(v2->i_gid));
>> @@ -50,8 +58,16 @@ static int read_inode(struct inode *inode, void *data)
>> vi->inode_isize = sizeof(struct erofs_inode_v1);
>> vi->xattr_isize = ondisk_xattr_ibody_size(v1->i_xattr_icount);
>>
>> - vi->raw_blkaddr = le32_to_cpu(v1->i_u.raw_blkaddr);
>> inode->i_mode = le16_to_cpu(v1->i_mode);
>> + if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) ||
>> + S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode)) {
>> + vi->raw_blkaddr = le32_to_cpu(v1->i_u.raw_blkaddr);
>> + } else if (S_ISCHR(inode->i_mode) || S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode)) {
>> + inode->i_rdev =
>> + new_decode_dev(le32_to_cpu(v1->i_u.rdev));
>> + } else if (S_ISFIFO(inode->i_mode) || S_ISSOCK(inode->i_mode)) {
>> + inode->i_rdev = 0;
>> + }
>
> ditto,
Right.
>
>
> The other code looks fine for me,
> I think a basic test is needed for the function of this patch tho.
Yeah, I hope Guifu will leave the time for testing the patch.
>
> If you send out the next patch, you could add:
> Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25 at huawei.com>
Thanks for the review.
Thanks,
>
> Thanks,
> Gao Xiang
>
>>
>> i_uid_write(inode, le16_to_cpu(v1->i_uid));
>> i_gid_write(inode, le16_to_cpu(v1->i_gid));
>> @@ -168,6 +184,12 @@ int fill_inode(struct inode *inode, int isdir)
>> &page_symlink_inode_operations;
>> #endif
>> inode_nohighmem(inode);
>> + } else if (S_ISCHR(inode->i_mode) || S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode) ||
>> + S_ISFIFO(inode->i_mode) || S_ISSOCK(inode->i_mode)) {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_EROFS_FS_XATTR
>> + inode->i_op = &erofs_special_inode_operations;
>> +#endif
>> + init_special_inode(inode, inode->i_mode, inode->i_rdev);
>> } else {
>> err = -EIO;
>> goto out_unlock;
>> @@ -244,6 +266,13 @@ const struct inode_operations erofs_symlink_xattr_iops = {
>> .listxattr = erofs_listxattr,
>> #endif
>> };
>> +
>> +const struct inode_operations erofs_special_inode_operations = {
>> +#if (LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(4, 9, 0))
>> + .listxattr = erofs_listxattr,
>> +#endif
>> +};
>> +
>> #endif
>>
>> #if (LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(4, 2, 0))
>> diff --git a/fs/erofs/internal.h b/fs/erofs/internal.h
>> index 7670c2ed53d2..43620c07044d 100644
>> --- a/fs/erofs/internal.h
>> +++ b/fs/erofs/internal.h
>> @@ -364,6 +364,7 @@ extern const struct inode_operations simple_symlink_inode_operations;
>> #ifdef CONFIG_EROFS_FS_XATTR
>> extern const struct inode_operations erofs_symlink_xattr_iops;
>> extern const struct inode_operations erofs_fast_symlink_xattr_iops;
>> +extern const struct inode_operations erofs_special_inode_operations;
>> #endif
>>
>> static inline void set_inode_fast_symlink(struct inode *inode)
>>
More information about the Linux-erofs
mailing list