[WIP] [NOMERGE] [RFC PATCH v0.3 3/6] erofs: introduce erofs_map_blocks_iter

Chao Yu yuchao0 at huawei.com
Mon Jul 2 20:48:26 AEST 2018


Hi Xiang,

On 2018/7/2 11:47, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Hi Chao,
> 
> On 2018/7/2 11:36, Chao Yu wrote:
>> We can do both of them, let's treat erofs branch as master branch, and we can
>> split erofs-dev branch (dev-test will not be so obvious to indicate that branch
>> is belong to erofs, so let's use erofs-dev) from erofs branch for further
>> development.
>>
>> So in erofs-dev, we can do anything temporarily change and testing, and once it
>> becomes stable, we can merge there-in patches back to erofs branch.
>>
>> And for any old codes or implementation obsolescing in erofs branch, let's use
>> git-revert or remove codes in a separated patch instead of dropping a patch
>> directly. :)
>>
>> How do you think?
> 
> *nod* *nod* *nod*, this policy is fine with me :)
> 
> and for these backport branches, I try to stablize the new unzip subsystem this week...

Alright,

> 
> and then we could start to begin backport and the whole fs bugfix work,
> eg. starting from seperate and discard these confusing LINUX_VERSION marcos...

Forgot to compile old version kernels, let me start to prepare them from this week.

Thanks,

> 
> Thanks,
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
> 
> .
> 



More information about the Linux-erofs mailing list