[PATCH RFC 03/16] pinctrl: aspeed: g5: Allow use of LPC node instead of LPC host controller
Andrew Jeffery
andrew at codeconstruct.com.au
Fri Jan 9 12:17:36 AEDT 2026
On Wed, 2025-12-31 at 22:38 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 9:46 AM Andrew Jeffery
> <andrew at codeconstruct.com.au> wrote:
>
> > There's currently a wart where the Aspeed LPC host controller has no
> > binding specified, but the pinctrl binding depends on referencing its
> > node.
> >
> > Allow specification of a phandle to the parent LPC controller instead.
> > Fall back to testing for a compatible parent node if the provided
> > phandle doesn't directly resolve to the LPC controller node.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew at codeconstruct.com.au>
>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linusw at kernel.org>
>
> I guess when this is non-RFC I will just apply these two patches.
Yeah, no dramas. I intend to split what remains to be applied into
separate (non-RFC) follow-up series now that many of the changes have
been applied.
Andrew
More information about the Linux-aspeed
mailing list