[PATCH v5 07/23] pinctrl: ma35: #undef field_{get,prep}() before local definition

[Yury Norov]

On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 03:33:49PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Yury,
> 
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 at 15:30, Yury Norov <yury.norov at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 03:19:45PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 7:43 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
> > > <geert+renesas at glider.be> wrote:
> > > > Prepare for the advent of globally available common field_get() and
> > > > field_prep() macros by undefining the symbols before defining local
> > > > variants.  This prevents redefinition warnings from the C preprocessor
> > > > when introducing the common macros later.
> > > >
> > > > Suggested-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov at gmail.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas at glider.be>
> > >
> > > Do you want me to just merge this patch to the pinctrl tree or do
> > > you have other plans?
> >
> > There's a couple nits from Andy, and also a clang W=1 warning to
> > address. So I think, v6 is needed.
> 
> Indeed....
> 
> > But overlall, the series is OK, and I'd like to take it in bitmaps
> > branch as it's more related to bits rather than a particular
> > subsystem.
> 
> OK, fine for me (if I can still get an immutable branch ;-)
> 
> Note that as of today there are two more to fix in next:
> commit d21b4338159ff7d7 ("mtd: rawnand: sunxi: introduce ecc_mode_mask
> in sunxi_nfc_caps") in next-20251029
> commit 6fc2619af1eb6f59 ("mtd: rawnand: sunxi: rework pattern found
> registers") in next-20251029

Oh, OK. Didn't actually want to undercut you. :) So, at your
discretion. Just let me know what you'd prefer.

Thanks,
Yury