[PATCH v2 3/3] clk: aspeed: add AST2700 clk driver

[Ryan Chen]

> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] clk: aspeed: add AST2700 clk driver
> 
> Quoting Ryan Chen (2024-08-27 23:27:40)
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/Kconfig index
> > 983ef4f36d8c..855b65f2d6dd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/Kconfig
> > @@ -269,6 +269,16 @@ config COMMON_CLK_ASPEED
> >           The G4 and G5 series, including the ast2400 and ast2500, are
> supported
> >           by this driver.
> >
> > +config COMMON_CLK_AST2700
> > +       bool "Clock driver for AST2700 SoC"
> > +       depends on ARCH_ASPEED || COMPILE_TEST
> > +       select MFD_SYSCON
> 
> Why is this a syscon?
I will remove it. 
> 
> > +       select RESET_CONTROLLER
> > +       help
> > +         This driver provides support for clock on AST2700 SoC.
> > +         This driver is responsible for managing the various clocks
> required
> > +         by the peripherals and cores within the AST2700.
> > +
> >  config COMMON_CLK_S2MPS11
> >         tristate "Clock driver for S2MPS1X/S5M8767 MFD"
> >         depends on MFD_SEC_CORE || COMPILE_TEST diff --git
> > a/drivers/clk/clk-ast2700.c b/drivers/clk/clk-ast2700.c new file mode
> > 100644 index 000000000000..7e0466e73980
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-ast2700.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,1198 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (c) 2024 ASPEED Technology Inc.
> > + * Author: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen at aspeedtech.com>  */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/bits.h>
> > +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> [...]
> > +
> > +struct ast2700_reset {
> > +       void __iomem *base;
> > +       struct ast2700_reset_signal const *signal;
> > +       struct reset_controller_dev rcdev; };
> 
> Please move the reset controller to the drivers/reset directory by means of
> using an auxiliary device. There are some existing examples in there if you
> grep for auxiliary_device in drivers/reset to help guide.

Do you mean to have another reset controller driver?
If yes, I may need syscon for remap two drivers.
> 
> > +
> > +#define to_rc_data(p) container_of(p, struct ast2700_reset, rcdev)
> > +
> [...]
> > +
> > +static int ast2700_soc0_clk_init(struct device_node *soc0_node) {
> > +       struct clk_hw_onecell_data *clk_data;
> > +       void __iomem *clk_base;
> [...]
> > +                                            0, clk_base +
> SCU0_CLK_STOP,
> > +                                            28, 0,
> > + &ast2700_clk_lock);
> > +
> > +       of_clk_add_hw_provider(soc0_node, of_clk_hw_onecell_get,
> > + clk_data);
> > +
> > +       return 0;
> > +};
> > +
> > +CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER(ast2700_soc0, "aspeed,ast2700-scu0",
> > +ast2700_soc0_clk_init); CLK_OF_DECLARE_DRIVER(ast2700_soc1,
> > +"aspeed,ast2700-scu1", ast2700_soc1_clk_init);
> 
> Why can't this be a platform driver?
Due to clk and reset will be the first driver in core.
Do you think all drivers should be platform driver?