[PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-aspeed: test: Fix dependencies when KUNIT=m
andrew at aj.id.au
Mon Jul 18 10:44:48 AEST 2022
On Fri, 15 Jul 2022, at 13:33, David Gow wrote:
> While the sdhci-of-aspeed KUnit tests do work when builtin, and do work
> when KUnit itself is being built as a module, the two together break.
> This is because the KUnit tests (understandably) depend on KUnit, so a
> built-in test cannot build if KUnit is a module.
> Fix this by adding a dependency on (MMC_SDHCI_OF_ASPEED=m || KUNIT=y),
> which only excludes this one problematic configuration.
> This was reported on a nasty openrisc-randconfig run by the kernel test
> robot, though for some reason (compiler optimisations removing the test
> code?) I wasn't able to reproduce it locally on x86:
> Fixes: 291cd54e5b05 ("mmc: sdhci-of-aspeed: test: Use kunit_test_suite() macro")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow at google.com>
> drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
> index 10c563999d3d..e63608834411 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
> @@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ config MMC_SDHCI_OF_ASPEED
> config MMC_SDHCI_OF_ASPEED_TEST
> bool "Tests for the ASPEED SDHCI driver" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> depends on MMC_SDHCI_OF_ASPEED && KUNIT
> + depends on (MMC_SDHCI_OF_ASPEED=m || KUNIT=y)
Should this replace the line above? Isn't it just more constrained?
Regardless, thanks for your work here, the kunit integration with the
ASPEED SDHCI driver bothered me a lot when I wrote it.
More information about the Linux-aspeed