[PATCH] usb: gadget: udc: clean up comments

[Tom Rix]

On 4/11/22 3:22 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 11:08:28AM -0400, Tom Rix wrote:
>> SPDX
>> *.h use /* */ style comments
>>
>> For double words, remove
>> with, also
>>
>> Spelling replacements
>> wayt to way
>> wakup to wakeup
>> Contrl to Control
>> cheks to checks
>> initiaization to initialization
>> dyanmic to dynamic
> Something really wrong with indentation above.
>
> ...
>
>>   drivers/usb/gadget/udc/amd5536udc.h       | 2 +-
>>   drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/core.c | 2 +-
>>   drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/ep0.c  | 2 +-
>>   drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/hub.c  | 2 +-
>>   drivers/usb/gadget/udc/aspeed-vhub/vhub.h | 4 ++--
>>   drivers/usb/gadget/udc/at91_udc.c         | 2 +-
>>   drivers/usb/gadget/udc/bdc/bdc_core.c     | 4 ++--
>>   drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c             | 4 ++--
>>   drivers/usb/gadget/udc/trace.h            | 2 +-
> I believe that Greg's bot asks to split on per-driver basis.
> OTOH I don't see anything that can be problematic if in one
> change. So, it's up to maintainers then.

Yes, whatever folks want. I can split these.

I have been cleaning up the comments in other areas and am trying to 
strike a balance between too big of a patch vs peppering with many 
single changes.

Tom

>
> ...
>
>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/amd5536udc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/amd5536udc.h
>>    * amd5536.h -- header for AMD 5536 UDC high/full speed USB device controller
> At the same time you may drop the filename(s) from the file(s) as this very
> one shows why it's good not to have a filename inside file.
>