[v5 04/15] iio: adc: aspeed: Keep model data to driver data.

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Thu, 16 Sep 2021 03:52:24 +0000
Joel Stanley <joel at jms.id.au> wrote:

> On Sun, 5 Sept 2021 at 14:47, Jonathan Cameron <jic23 at kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 5 Sep 2021 15:33:39 +0100
> > Jonathan Cameron <jic23 at kernel.org> wrote:
> >  
> > > On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 15:14:47 +0800
> > > Billy Tsai <billy_tsai at aspeedtech.com> wrote:
> > >  
> > > > Keep the model data pointer to driver data for reducing the usage of
> > > > of_device_get_match_data().
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Billy Tsai <billy_tsai at aspeedtech.com>  
> > > This one starts to be impacted by the fix (as its in the context).
> > > Rather than making a mess of things for linux-next etc I'll hold
> > > off on these until that fix is upstream in a few weeks.
> > >
> > > If I seem to have lost it (it's been known to happen :( ) then
> > > feel free to poke me!  
> >
> > Having taken another look at the rest of the series (and Philipp's review)
> > please do a v6 starting from this patch.  
> 
> I'd recommend against the practice of half applying a series. I have
> just spent a good chunk of time looking at v6, and wondering why it
> won't apply to any tags in Linus tree nor to next.

Hi Joel,

In this particular case it may been unwise, but in general it allows me to
handle a higher volume of patches than would otherwise be possible.
There are of course other approaches, but this one works well for me.
I did express to what tree and branch these were being applied
+ exposed for build tests.

> 
> (It was made worse by the branch you applied them to not being part of
> linux-next.)

It will be shortly. That was just unfortunate timing because of the end of the
merge window and a some issues that 0-day found in other patches in the tree
that needed to be fixed up before making a mess in next.

Jonathan

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Joel