[PATCH v2 00/21] ipmi: Allow raw access to KCS devices
arnd at arndb.de
Fri Apr 9 18:13:36 AEST 2021
On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 6:09 AM Joel Stanley <joel at jms.id.au> wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 23:47, Andrew Jeffery <andrew at aj.id.au> wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Apr 2021, at 21:44, Corey Minyard wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 10:27:46AM +0930, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> > > There were some minor concerns that were unanswered, and there really
> > > was no review by others for many of the patches.
> > Right; I was planning to clean up the minor concerns once I'd received
> > some more feedback. I could have done a better job of communicating
> > that :)
> I'll merge the first five through the aspeed tree this coming merge
> window. We have acks from the relevant maintainers.
> Arnd: would you prefer that this come as it's own pull request, or as
> part of the device tree branch?
When you are unsure, it's almost never wrong to go for a separate
branch, which gives you a chance to have a concise description
of the contents in the tag. This would be particularly helpful if there
are incompatible changes to the DT binding that require a justification.
If you are only adding a few DT nodes to existing files, then merging
these through the regular branch is probably easier.
More information about the Linux-aspeed