[PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-aspeed list remarks consistent
joel at jms.id.au
Mon Sep 14 22:25:41 AEST 2020
On Sun, 13 Sep 2020 at 09:57, Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > Commit f15a3ea80391 ("MAINTAINERS: Add ASPEED BMC GFX DRM driver entry")
> > does not mention that linux-aspeed at lists.ozlabs.org is moderated for
> > non-subscribers, but the other three entries for
> > linux-aspeed at lists.ozlabs.org do.
> > By 'majority vote' among entries, let us assume it was just missed here and
> > adjust it to be consistent with others.
> > Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn at gmail.com>
> > ---
> > applies cleanly on master and next-20200911
> > Joel, please ack.
> > David, Daniel, please pick this minor non-urgent clean-up patch.
> > This patch submission will also show me if linux-aspeed is moderated or
> > not. I have not subscribed to linux-aspeed and if it shows up quickly in
> > the archive, the list is probably not moderated; and if it takes longer,
> > it is moderated, and hence, validating the patch.
> I did quickly get back an moderation email that my email is being held
> back. So, that response validates my patch.
The bmc related lists (openbmc@, linux-aspeed@, linux-fsi@) on
ozlabs.org that I own have a soft-moderation policy. The first time
you post a patch I add you to a whitelist. Given the low volume on
these lists this works for me.
I don't know if this necessitates marking the lists as moderated in
MAINTINERS, but if you find that helpful then that's fine with me.
Acked-by: Joel Stanley <joel at jms.id.au>
More information about the Linux-aspeed