[PATCH 2/3] Arm: dts: aspeed-g6: Add sgpio node
Joel Stanley
joel at jms.id.au
Wed Oct 28 16:10:49 AEDT 2020
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 04:56, Billy Tsai <billy_tsai at aspeedtech.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Joel,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> On 2020/10/12, 12:35 PM, Joel Stanley wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 03:32, Billy Tsai <billy_tsai at aspeedtech.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > This patch is used to add sgpiom and sgpios nodes and add compatible
> > > string for sgpiom.
> >
> > You also need to add sgpios documentation to the bindings docs.
> >
> > Whenever you add new device tree bindings to the kernel tree you
> > should add documentation for them.
> >
> > When preparing patches for submission, use scripts/checkpatch.pl to
> > check for common issues. It will warn you if you are adding strings
> > that are not documented.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Joel
> >
> Because the driver of sgpios doesn't be implemented, so I don't know how to describe it at sgpio-aspeed.txt.
> Can I just add compatible string " aspeed,ast2600-sgpios " to the document for bypassing the warning of checkpatch?
Ignore the sgpios issue for now; we don't have a driver for it so
there's no need to add strings. Drop that part from your dts patch.
> > >
> > > - compatible : Should be one of
> > > - "aspeed,ast2400-sgpio", "aspeed,ast2500-sgpio"
> > > + "aspeed,ast2400-sgpio", "aspeed,ast2500-sgpio", "aspeed,ast2600-sgpiom"
> >
> > I think we should add sgpiom strings for the ast2500 (and ast2400?)
> > too, as this is how they should have been named in the first place:
> >
> If I change the document whether I also need to send the patch for sgpio driver and g5/g4.dtsi?
For the sgpiom? We already have a driver for that.
As I said above, make this about fixing the sgpio master and put aside
the sgpio slave issue for now.
Cheers,
Joel
> > > - compatible : Should be one of
> > > "aspeed,ast2400-sgpio", "aspeed,ast2500-sgpio"
> > > "aspeed,ast2400-sgpiom", "aspeed,ast2500-sgpiom", "aspeed,ast2600-sgpiom"
More information about the Linux-aspeed
mailing list