[Lguest] [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes
Avi Kivity
avi at redhat.com
Mon Dec 1 21:41:53 EST 2008
Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Avi Kivity <avi at redhat.com> wrote:
> ...
>
>> Once it's done there's no reason not to commit it. But the effort expended
>> to do it is gone, without any measurable return.
>>
>>
> ...
>
> Not sure Avi what you mean but as far as I know Alexander is working on
> this file so he need just time to finish (we all have other duties you know :).
> So I think the idea Peter proposed could be merged right after Alexander
> will have finished. At least the Peter's suggestion was recorded in this
> thread which means it will *not* be lost eventually. Or you meant something
> else (yep, I could have it translated plain wrong)?
>
What I mean is that hpa's patch makes the kernel better, so it should be
applied. I'm not sure what else Alexander is working on, but I do hope
the improvements will be more concrete.
(Alexander, I apologise for being so discouraging; but I really feel
these improvements are marginal)
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
More information about the Lguest
mailing list