[Lguest] [PATCH 1/6] virtio interace

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Thursday 20 September 2007, Rusty Russell wrote:
> + * virtio_driver - operations for a virtio I/O driver
> + * @name: the name of the driver (KBUILD_MODNAME).
> + * @owner: the module which contains these routines (ie. THIS_MODULE).
> + * @id_table: the ids (we re-use PCI ids) serviced by this driver.
> + * @probe: the function to call when a device is found.  Returns a token for
> + *    remove, or PTR_ERR().
> + * @remove: the function when a device is removed.
> + */
> +struct virtio_driver {
> +       const char *name;
> +       struct module *owner;
> +       struct pci_device_id *id_table;
> +       void *(*probe)(struct device *device,
> +                      struct virtio_config_space *config,
> +                      struct virtqueue_ops *vqops);
> +       void (*remove)(void *dev);
> +};
> +
> +int register_virtio_driver(struct virtio_driver *drv);
> +void unregister_virtio_driver(struct virtio_driver *drv);
> +
> +/* The particular virtio backend supplies these. */
> +struct virtio_backend_ops {
> +       int (*register_driver)(struct virtio_driver *drv);
> +       void (*unregister_driver)(struct virtio_driver *drv);
> +};
> +extern struct virtio_backend_ops virtio_backend_ops;

This still seems a little awkward. From what I understand, you register
a virtio_driver, which leads to a pci_driver (or whatever you are based on)
to be registered behind the covers, so that the pci_device can be used
directly as the virtio device.

I think there should instead be a pci_driver that automatically binds
to all PCI based virtio imlpementations and creates a child device for
the actual virtio_device. Then you can have the virtio_driver itself
be based on a device_driver, and you can get rid of the global
virtio_backend_ops. That will be useful when a virtual machine
has two ways to get at the virtio devices, e.g. a KVM guest that
has both hcall based probing for virtio devices and some other virtio
devices that are exported through PCI.

	Arnd <><