[Lguest] [PATCH 0/6] virtio with config abstraction and ringimplementation

[Dor Laor]

Dor Laor wrote:
> Rusty Russell wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>         This patch series attempts to come closer to unifying kvm and 
>> lguest's
>> usage of virtio.  As these two are the first implementations we've seen,
>> I hope making them closer will make future ones closer too.
>>
>>         Drivers now unpack their own configuration: their probe() 
>> methods are
>> uniform.  The configuration mechanism is extensible and can be backed by
>> PCI, a string of bytes, or something else.
>>
>>         I've abstracted out the lguest ring buffer code into a common 
>> library.
>> The format has changed slightly (mainly because I had an epiphany about
>> inter-guest I/O).
>>
>>         I also implemented a console (lguest needs one).
>>
>>         Finally, there is a working lguest implementation.  
>> Unfortunately,
>> lguest is being refactored for non-i386 ports, so the virtio patches sit
>> at the end of the (quite long) for-2.6.24 patchqueue.  Nonetheless, they
>> can be found at http://lguest.ozlabs.org/patches (click on bz2 to get
>> the series).
>>
>> Cheers!
>> Rusty.
>>
> Superb job, it saved me the burden of try to merge the in-house 
> virtio_backend.
>
> I like the separation of the ring code, the improved descriptors and 
> the notify too.
> Regarding the pci config space, I rather see config_ops type of 
> operations to let
> the 390/xen/other implementations jump on our wagon.
>
> Maybe change the offset/len type into a handle pointer and function 
> pointers.
> The best would be to let them comment on that. I glimpsed over xen 
> netfront.c and I think that
> the config space can be used without too many hassles
> Dor.
>
Of course I'll rebase what's left of my code over the new patches.